11-06-1961 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

315 seconded by Schlueter and carried, the recommendation of the Zoning Administrator was approved, and Appeal Application No. 39, filed by Paul G. Mast, George L. Moor~, Appeal Appl. No. 40 Gerald R. Adler Variance Appl. No. 1542 and A. L. Ramirez denied. Appeal Application No. 40 of Gerald R. Adler was presented on Variance Application No. 1542 to construct a tw~-story, ~l-unit apart~ment building, plus one Manager unit, at lO17, lO21 and 1029 North Flower Street, in the R-2 District, wherein Appellant appeals Condition (2) that a six-foot solid block wall be constructed around the entire.project except the wa11 shall not exceed 4 feet in height from the required building line to the front property line. Attorney Ridley C. ~,!th~i 1022 North Flower Street, r~ues~e~l clarification of the ingress and egress of vehicles through the one driveway, and because of the high density of the area, 10 ~i or 15 feet of property should be taken from the east side of Flower Street for widening purposes due to the heavy traffic on Flower Street. Mr. Charles Cushm~ii 1014 North Parton Street, presented a communication signed by Oscar E. Resiow, 1022 North Parton Street, requesting the six-foot solid block fence be required, instea~ of wood fencing, and on motion of Counci)m~n Brewer, seconded by Schlueter and carried, the communication was received and filed. Mr. Charles Cush,~n, 1014 North Parton Street, stated if the woodfence is permitted his property wouldhave three kinds of fencing and would be a detriment to his property. On motion of Counc!~man Brewer, seconded by Schlueter and carried, the recommendation of the Zoning A~m~nistrator was approved, and Appeal Application No. 40 filed by Gerald Appeal Appl. No. 41 Albert P. Kelso, et ux (Reso. No. 61-253 Granting Appeal) R. Adler, denied. Councilman Heinly arrived at 8:BO P.M. Appeal Application No. 41 of Albert P. and Lorraine S. Kelso was presented on Variance Application No.~ 1539, to build eight one-bedroom units with less than re- quired lot area per unit, and less than required off-street parking, on property fm~ediately south of 1129 South Pacific Avenue, in the R-3 District, wherein Appellant appeals the denial of the Zoning Administrator. Attorney Bruce ~mner, 1016 North Broadway, representing Mr. and Mrs. Kelso, stated the property is part of a large parcel owned by the Appellants and requested approval to construct an apartment building to contain eight one-bedroom units, with nine parking spaces, as the area is an apartment area and if the request is denied, the Appellants would be prevented from developing this particular property. Mr. S~mmer presented a statement signed by Mr. and Mrs. Kelso, setting forth their reasons for this type of construction. On motion of Councilman Brewer, seconded by Schlueter and carried, the statement was received and filed. The Council having unanimously weived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Heialy, seconded by Schlueter and carried, the following Resolution entitled: Appeal Appl. No. 42 H. A. Paskett et ux Variance Apol. No. 1545 Reso. ~o. ~'~254 ~ranting Variance) "Resolution No; 61-253 granting Variance No. 1539 on Appeal Application No. 41 filed by Albert P. and Lorraine S. Kelso after the Planning Commission had denied a Variance" was considered and passed by the following vote: Ayes, Councils- Henry R. Schlueter, Dele H. Heiuly, Bob Brewer, Royal E. Hubbard Noes, Councilmen None Absent, Counc~!men A.A. Hall Appeal Application No. 42 of H. A. and Rose E. Paskett was presented on Variance Application No. 1545 to allow construction of a five-unit apartment building, in addition to a single family dwelling, at 1931 West Washington Avenue, in the R-2 District, wherein Appellant appeals the denial of the Zoning Administrator.