340
<br />
<br />Appeal Appl. No. 47
<br />Continental Baking Co.
<br />Variance Appl. No. 1551
<br />Reso. No. 61-280
<br />Granting Appeal
<br />
<br />Appeal Appl. No. 48
<br />James G. and Edna Andritch
<br />Variance Appl. No. 1549
<br />
<br /> "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana granting
<br /> to California Gas Transmission Company, a California Corporation, its
<br /> subcessors and assigns, the franchise to construct, maintain, operate,
<br /> renew, repair, change the size of and remove or abandon in place a
<br /> pipe line, necessary or convenient for the Grantee's business in,
<br /> under, over, along, or across certain public streets, alleys and
<br /> ways dedicated to public use in the City of Santa Ana"
<br />
<br />was introduced, considered and placed on file for second reading.
<br />
<br />Appeal Application No. 47 of Continental Baking Company was presented on Variance
<br />Application No. 1551, to build an addition to existing warehouse, offices, etc.,
<br />in the R-1 District, on property located at the southwest corner of First and
<br />Pacific Avenues, in the C-1 and R-1 Districts, wherein the Applicant appeals the
<br />condition of sidewalk requirements on Walnut Avenue. Edward J. Till, Architect,
<br />145 West Painter, Whittier, representing the Applicant, presented photographs in
<br />duplicate showing three vie~$of the intersection of Pacific Avenue and subject
<br />property. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the
<br />photographs were received and filed. Mr. Till stated their wall had been construc~
<br />ed prior to the change in the grade of the street, and it would involve a great
<br />deal of expense to reconstruct the wall to place the sidewalk as required, and re-
<br />quested consideration to install the sidewalk to the curb line as an alternative.
<br />The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of
<br />Councilman Heinly, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the following Resolution en-
<br />t it led:
<br />
<br /> "Resolution No. 61-280 granting appeal on Appeal Application No. 47
<br /> filed by Continental Baking Company from one condition imposed pur-
<br /> suant to a variance granted upon Variance Application No. 1551 by
<br /> the Zoning Administrator"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Henry H. Schlueter,
<br /> Dale H. Heinly, A. A. Hall
<br />Noes, Councilmen None
<br />Absent, Councilmen Bob Brewer
<br />
<br />Appeal Application No. 48 of James G. and Edna Andritch, was presented on Variance
<br />Application No. 1549, to build a duplex on an R-2 lot with existing single family
<br />dwelling at 1437 Cypress Avenue, in the R-2 District, wherein the Applicants appeal
<br />the denial of the Zoning Administrator. Mrs. Walter Fredriksen, 12912 Dean Street,
<br />
<br />representing the Applicant~, stated that although the maps show both sides of the
<br /> Avenue
<br />1400 block of Cypress/to be zoned R-2, there is a parking lot l'or Safeway directly
<br />
<br />across the street fro~ the Andritch property, and presented a photograph of the
<br />parking lot taken from the Andritch's driveway on the east side of Cypress Avenue.
<br />On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the photograph was
<br />received and filed. Mrs. Fredriksen further stated that other variances had been
<br />granted in the vicinity; that since the lots in this block are of unusual depth,
<br />160 feet, and a re~oning to R-3 of the area is being contemplated, she felt the
<br />variance should be granted. Mrs. James Andritch, 1437 South Cypress Avenue, stated
<br />her proposed duplex would only have on~ bedroom to each unit and would sppeal to
<br />elderly couples, school teachers or married couples without children; a duplex
<br />would give her good use of the land as a residence and also as an income; would
<br />increase the property tax to the City; and would help to serve in the need for rent
<br />tal housing. On motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the
<br />decision of the Zoning Administrator was upheld, and Appeal Application No. 48,
<br />filed by James G. and Edna Andritch, denied.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|