Laserfiche WebLink
340 <br /> <br />Appeal Appl. No. 47 <br />Continental Baking Co. <br />Variance Appl. No. 1551 <br />Reso. No. 61-280 <br />Granting Appeal <br /> <br />Appeal Appl. No. 48 <br />James G. and Edna Andritch <br />Variance Appl. No. 1549 <br /> <br /> "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana granting <br /> to California Gas Transmission Company, a California Corporation, its <br /> subcessors and assigns, the franchise to construct, maintain, operate, <br /> renew, repair, change the size of and remove or abandon in place a <br /> pipe line, necessary or convenient for the Grantee's business in, <br /> under, over, along, or across certain public streets, alleys and <br /> ways dedicated to public use in the City of Santa Ana" <br /> <br />was introduced, considered and placed on file for second reading. <br /> <br />Appeal Application No. 47 of Continental Baking Company was presented on Variance <br />Application No. 1551, to build an addition to existing warehouse, offices, etc., <br />in the R-1 District, on property located at the southwest corner of First and <br />Pacific Avenues, in the C-1 and R-1 Districts, wherein the Applicant appeals the <br />condition of sidewalk requirements on Walnut Avenue. Edward J. Till, Architect, <br />145 West Painter, Whittier, representing the Applicant, presented photographs in <br />duplicate showing three vie~$of the intersection of Pacific Avenue and subject <br />property. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the <br />photographs were received and filed. Mr. Till stated their wall had been construc~ <br />ed prior to the change in the grade of the street, and it would involve a great <br />deal of expense to reconstruct the wall to place the sidewalk as required, and re- <br />quested consideration to install the sidewalk to the curb line as an alternative. <br />The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of <br />Councilman Heinly, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the following Resolution en- <br />t it led: <br /> <br /> "Resolution No. 61-280 granting appeal on Appeal Application No. 47 <br /> filed by Continental Baking Company from one condition imposed pur- <br /> suant to a variance granted upon Variance Application No. 1551 by <br /> the Zoning Administrator" <br /> <br />was considered and passed by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Henry H. Schlueter, <br /> Dale H. Heinly, A. A. Hall <br />Noes, Councilmen None <br />Absent, Councilmen Bob Brewer <br /> <br />Appeal Application No. 48 of James G. and Edna Andritch, was presented on Variance <br />Application No. 1549, to build a duplex on an R-2 lot with existing single family <br />dwelling at 1437 Cypress Avenue, in the R-2 District, wherein the Applicants appeal <br />the denial of the Zoning Administrator. Mrs. Walter Fredriksen, 12912 Dean Street, <br /> <br />representing the Applicant~, stated that although the maps show both sides of the <br /> Avenue <br />1400 block of Cypress/to be zoned R-2, there is a parking lot l'or Safeway directly <br /> <br />across the street fro~ the Andritch property, and presented a photograph of the <br />parking lot taken from the Andritch's driveway on the east side of Cypress Avenue. <br />On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, the photograph was <br />received and filed. Mrs. Fredriksen further stated that other variances had been <br />granted in the vicinity; that since the lots in this block are of unusual depth, <br />160 feet, and a re~oning to R-3 of the area is being contemplated, she felt the <br />variance should be granted. Mrs. James Andritch, 1437 South Cypress Avenue, stated <br />her proposed duplex would only have on~ bedroom to each unit and would sppeal to <br />elderly couples, school teachers or married couples without children; a duplex <br />would give her good use of the land as a residence and also as an income; would <br />increase the property tax to the City; and would help to serve in the need for rent <br />tal housing. On motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the <br />decision of the Zoning Administrator was upheld, and Appeal Application No. 48, <br />filed by James G. and Edna Andritch, denied. <br /> <br /> <br />