Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION 92-100 691 <br />PAGE 2 <br /> <br />surrounding commercial area, which is detrimental to the <br />economic base and property values of the neighborhood and <br />the community. <br /> <br />D. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect <br />the General Plan of the City; <br /> <br />The subject sign is contrary to the goals and objectives <br />of the General Plan insofar as they seek to promote non- <br />blighting economic development. <br /> <br />2. Variance Application No. 92-010 is hereby denied. <br /> <br />ADOPTED this 21st day of December <br /> <br />1992__. <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br />~nlce C. Guy ~ <br />Clerk of the Counc-ll' <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBERS: <br /> <br />Young Aye <br />Pulido Aye <br />Lutz Aye <br />Mills <br />Moreno <br />Norton <br />Richardson <br /> <br />APPROVED AS TO FORM: <br /> <br />City Attorney <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />