|
496
<br />
<br /> .speal ApplJ No. 64
<br />Variance Appl.
<br />No. 164~
<br />F. Lavelle Sanders
<br />
<br />Bellflower, stated they were in no way opposed to the purpose of the proposal, but
<br />felt the infirmary should be established in an appropriate zone, and as,unfortunat
<br />ly, this is a distress tract, and in order to encourage future ownership by single
<br />family residents, they are opposed to the granting of the Variance. Nario Siracus
<br />ll09 South Corta Drive, stated he lived about one block away, and he objected be-
<br />cause he believed others would make similar requests. It was moved by Councilman
<br />Heinly that a Resolution be adopted overruling the Planning Commaission and grantin
<br />
<br />the Variance. Motion lost for lack of a second. It was moved by Councilman
<br />
<br />Hubbard, and seconded by Schlueter, that Appeal Application No. 63 be denied and
<br />
<br />the decision oF the Planning Commission upheld. Motion not carried. On motion of
<br />Councilman Brewer, seconded by Heinly and carried, the matter was tabled. Council
<br />man Hubbard voted no.
<br />
<br />Appeal Application No. 6h was presented on Variance Application No. 16h4, filed by
<br />
<br />F. Lavelle Sanders, to convert a rear portion of the lot in the R-1 District into
<br />
<br />off-street parking, at 1622 North Fairmont, where~n the applicant appeals the deni
<br />
<br />al of the Plaz,,~ing Commission. Attorney Charles G. Schlegel, 433 West Eighth Stre
<br /> ,orally
<br />representing the applicant,/requested that the matter be postponed to the next reg
<br />
<br />C oam~muicat ion
<br />Planning Cow~ ssion
<br />Abandonment Riverine
<br />Street .!
<br />
<br />Preliminary Record
<br />of Survey 267
<br />David claussen
<br />
<br />Communication
<br />Edwin P. Martin
<br />Preliminary Maps
<br />232 and 256
<br />Hubert and Rena
<br />Melton ~
<br />
<br />lar meeting. Elizabeth Livingston, 1606 Oakmont Place, stated the only objection
<br />to a postponement is that a lot of valuable time has been wasted by the interestedi
<br />parties that have already attended several meetings regarding this matter, and
<br />questioned the possibility of the matter also being postponed at the next meeting.
<br />On motion of Colluc~lman Eubbard, seconded by Heinly and carried, action on Appeal
<br />Application No. 64, filed by F. Lavelle Sanders, was postponed to the next meeting
<br />Cummo_nication was presented from the Planning C~ission referring the matter of
<br />the proposed abandonment of Riverine Street between Eighth and Tenth Streets to th
<br />Council with certain conditions of approval reco~anended in the event this portion
<br />of Riverine Street is abandoned. On motion of Councilm~n Hubbard, seconded by
<br />Brewer and carried, the communication from the Planning Co,~mission was received
<br />and filed, and the staff instructed to take the necessary steps relative to the
<br />abandonment of Riverine Street between Eighth and Tenth Streets.
<br />
<br />Communication was presented from the Planning Department recommending approval of
<br />Preliminary Record of Survey 267, filed by David Claussen, creating two lots lo-
<br />cated on the southwest corner of McFadden (Sugar) Avenue and Harbor Boulevard, sub
<br />Ject to conditions. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and car-
<br />ried, Preliminary Record of Survey 267, filed by David Claussen, was approved sub-
<br />Ject to conditions.
<br />
<br />Communication wes presented from Attorney Edwin P. Martin, 811 North Broadway,
<br />filed by Mr. and Mrs. Hubert Melton,
<br />reference conditions imposed on Prel~m~uary Mmps 232 and 256~ stating the Sub-
<br />
<br />Division Regulations of the Municipal Code, and in particular Section 9325, pro-
<br />vides for the reservation of strips to control access .to alleys for the protection
<br />of a substantial property right. Mr. and Mrs. Melton propose to dedicate a 20-foo
<br />right of way for the required alley plus a one foot reserved strip to the north of
<br />said alley to the City Council so that the City Council may control the access to
<br />the alley way on the north, with the request and upon the condition that if the
<br />property owner to the north desires to take advantage of the alley access, he be
<br />required to reimburse Mr. and Mrs. Melton for fifty per cent of the value of the
<br />improved alley, and requesting acceptance of the proposal by the City Council.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|