94-023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

440 RESOLUTION 94-023 17. The project sponsor shall implement a Transportation Demand Management Program CTDMP) included in Appendix C of the Traffic Analysis through the CC&Rs on the project. The TDMP shall (I) set a performance standard of a 15% reduction in trips otherwise anticipated, (2) require annual monitoring of traffic as compared to the standard, (3) contain a broad range of secondary TDM strategies to further reduce traffic, and (4) require that the project owners either pay a TDM penalty fee or implement the secondary strategies until the standard is met. 18. Participation in TSIA area-wide fee programs. 24. In addition to project specific mitigation measures listed above, the project sponsor shall participate in the TSIA area wide traffic fee programs. The project will cause four intersections immediately adjacent to the project currently operating at acceptable level of service to operate at unacceptable levels of service (80% of capacity or higher). Mitigation measures nos. 7 through 11, and 13 through 16 require the project proponent to complete all City master-planned improvements for those adjacent intersections and adjacent roadways on all fight-of-way owned by the proponent and through acquisition of right-of-way from the owner of property on the north side of 17th Street and on Tustin Avenue immediately south of the project. Mitigation measure no. 17 is designed to further reduce traffic impacts on those roadways and intersections through implementation of a Transportation Demand Management Program. The TDMP is designed to ensure that vehicle trips to the project are reduced by 155 from average levels generated for similar projects of Mitigation measure no. 18 on the project requires the pwponent to pay at the time of building permit issuance $1,054,952 in Santa Ana/Tustin Transportation System Improvement Area CTSIA) fees and $436,861 in Orange County Transportation Management Fees as its pro rata contribution to transportation improvements designed to mitigation area-wide traffic conditions, including traffic attributable to the project. These fees are based on current ordinances and are triggered at the time of building permit issuance. These ordinances are subject to change prior to that issuance. Some changes or alterations are within the responsibility or jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. Facts in Suo~ort of the Finding, The EIR states that the following potential improvement would mitigate cumulative traffic impacts at the intersection of Tustin and Santa Clara. However, jurisdiction sCSS626 ' 12-