94-023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RESOLUTION 94-023 443 its pro rata share to the construction of these improvements as calculated under the TSIA program. Construction of eastbound improvements at this intersection was identified in the EIR as a possible improvement to the intersection, but because the need for the improvement has not been substantiated at this time, the cities of Tustin and Santa Aria have not adopted the improvement as part of the joint powers agreement plan. The Santa Aha City Council hereby recommends that pursuant to their joint powers agreement, the cities of Tustin and Santa Aha (1) continue to monitor eastbound traffic at this intersection, and (2) if traffic reaches unacceptable levels, identify specific improvements for this intersection and add them to the TSIA program to be funded with TSIA fees, or other appropriate action. At such time as the improvement is included in the TSIA program, if TSIA fees have not yet b. een levied on this project, the project proponent would pay for its pro rata share of this improvement through payment of the new TSIA fee. The City Council has reviewed the overall cost of exactions and fees due as conditions on the proposed project and has concluded that those exactions and fees represent the project proponent's reasonable share of transportation improvements necessary to address cumulative traffic impacts. The City Council finds that requiring this potential improvement in addition to those exactions and fees would violate the requirement of Government Code Section 66005 that exactions and fees on development projects be reasonably related to impacts created by those projects. Tustin at 17th - Addition of a westbound right-mm lane, a third southbound thru lane, a second westbound left-toro lane, and a northbound fight-toro lane and conversion of a northbound right-toro lane to a shared northbound thru/fight-mm lane. Pursuant to their joint powers agreement, the cities of Tustin and Santa Aha have identified these improvements at this intersection as a priority to be funded with TSIA fees. Through payment of these fees, the project sponsor will contribute its pro rata share to the construction of these improvements as calculated under the TSIA program. The City Council has reviewed the overall cost of exactions and fees due as conditions on the proposed project and has concluded that those exactions and fees represent the project proponent's reasonable share of transportation improvements necessary to address cumulative traffic impacts. The City Council finds that requiring this potential improvement in addition to those exactions and fees would violate the requirement of Government Code Section 66005 that exactions and fees on development projects be reasonably related to impacts created by those projects.