Laserfiche WebLink
Bid Acceptance <br />Air Conditioning <br />& Storage Building <br />Bowers Museum <br /> <br />Bid Acceptance <br />Proj. D-42 & D-44 <br />Construction <br />Storm Drain <br /> e~g~ <br /> <br />Bid Acceptance <br />Construction <br />Sanitary Sewer <br />Project S-33 <br /> <br />Hearing on Reso. <br />of Intention 62-156 <br />Assessment Dist. 218 <br /> <br />A tabulation of bids was presented by the Manager for air conditioning system installa- ~ <br /> <br />tion and construction of storage building at Bowers Museum as follows: <br /> <br />Name Total Bid Bond <br /> <br />D. R. Putnam <br />R. L. Steiametz <br />Fred Beck Constr. Co. <br />I. L. Olson Constr. Co. <br />Crosby Construction Co. <br /> <br />$ 38,5oo.oo 5% <br />37,361.00 5% <br />33,629.00 5% <br />37,200.00 Cashier's Check <br />38,880.00 5% <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Schlueter and carried, the bid of Fred <br />Beck Construction Co. at a total cost of $33,629.00 was accepted and the other bids <br />rejected. <br /> <br />A tabulation of bids was presented by the Manager for Projects D-42, construction of a <br />storm drain along Old Talbert Avenue between Susan Street and the D-3 Channel, and <br />Project D-44, construction of a storm drain along Segerstrom Avenue between Susan Street <br />and the D-3 Channel, in accordance with Standard Specifications as follows: <br /> <br />Name Total Bid Bond <br /> <br />Knudson Construction Co. <br />Orange County Sewers Inc. <br />L. L. Dobkins Constr. Co. <br />James A. Moran Constr. Co. <br />A. H. Famularo <br /> <br />$ 37,934.00 10~ <br />3a,328.50 10% <br />39,403.35 10% <br />29,068.74 10~ <br />33,986.30 10~ <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Brewer, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the bid of James A. <br />Moran Construction Co. <br />Moran Construction Co., at a total cost of $29,068.74, was accepted and all other bids <br /> <br />rejected. <br /> <br />A tabulation of bids was presented by the Mmnager for Project S-33, construction of a <br />sanitary sewer in 17th Street between Tustin Avenue and Deodar Street,Deodar Street <br />North of 17th Street and Fairhaven Avenue between Grand Avenue and Cambridge Street in <br /> <br />accordance with Standard Specifications as follows: <br /> <br />Name Total Bid Bond <br /> <br />Gantry Construction Co. <br />Orange Co. Sewers, Inc. <br />Sanders & Wall, Inc. <br />L. L. Dobkins Construction Co. <br />Ralph DeLeon Construction Co. <br />A. H. Famularo <br />Lowe & Watson Construction Co. <br /> <br />$ 30,600.00 <br />29,595.60 <br />36,550.80 $4,000.00 <br />30,747.00 10~ <br />30,460.80 10% <br />37,095.60 10% <br />27,996.00 10~ <br /> <br />On motion of CounciLman Br~'wer, seconded by Hubbard and <br /> <br />carried, the lowest and best <br /> <br />bid of Lowe & Watson Construction Co., at the total of $27,996.00, was accepted and <br /> <br />all other bids rejected. <br /> <br />The Clerk reported that this was the time and place fixed for the hearing of protests <br />or objections against the work or the District, as described in Resolution of Intention <br />No. 52-156, in the matter of the construction of certain sewer lines together with <br />appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Santa Ana for the use and benefit <br />of the City of Santa Ana Assessment District No. 218 in said City, as described in said <br />Resolution of Intention No. 62-156. The Clerk also reported that affidavits in support <br />of the publication of the Resolution of Intention, the mailing of printed notices of <br />the adoption of said Resolution, and the posting of the Notice of Improvement, as <br />required by law, had been made and are on file in the office of the Clerk of the Council!. <br />The Mayor then inquired of the Clerk if any written protests or objections against the <br />work or the District had been filed with her in said matter. The Clerk reported that <br />no written protests had been filed with her prior to the time set for the hearing. <br /> <br />The Mayor then announced that the City Council would also hear any persons present who <br />desired to be heard orally and who had any protests or objections against the work or <br />assessment as set forth in the Resolution of Intention hereinabove mentioned. There <br />were none present at the meeting who protested or objected orally. No protests being <br /> <br /> <br />