Laserfiche WebLink
096 <br /> RESOLUTION 94-037 <br /> EXHIBIT <br /> <br />property taxes without limit as to rate or amount; hence they were <br />highly regarded by investors and commanded the lowest borrowing <br />rate because of their minimal credit risk. However, the affirma- <br />tive vote of two-thirds of the people is required to issue such <br />bonds. Due to the costs involved in such a bond issue, this type <br />of financing is not feasible for the purpose of financing the <br />construction of the Recreation Center or meeting the shortfall in <br />funding for the Recreation Center. <br /> <br /> Revenue bonds are payable from a specific revenue source <br />other than property taxes. These bonds have been used extensively <br />for financing water, sewer, or other utility systems, toll bridges <br />and airports, where revenues of the enterprises are reasonably well <br />assured. Issuance of conventional revenue bonds generally requires <br />a simple majority vote. However, the Recreation Center will <br />generate little, if any, revenue, making revenue bond financing <br />infeasible. <br /> <br /> The city's general revenues are another possible source <br />of revenue for construction of the Recreation Center. However, <br />since the passage of Proposition 13, severe strains have been <br />placed on the City's revenues. Most devastating of the causes for <br />revenue curtailment has been the withholding from cities by the <br />State of California of revenues traditionally subvented to local <br />government. Some of these sources simply have been commandeered by <br />the State. Other sources of subvented revenues have been withheld <br />on an allegedly temporary basis, but there is no certainty that the <br />reduction of the subvention stream might not be permanent. The <br />fact of dimin±shed revenue, and the need to provide a suitable <br />level of services, dictate that the City explore alternative means <br />of financing public facilities while maintaining an adequate level <br />of vital services with its General Fund revenues. <br /> <br /> Tax increment revenues or tax allocation bond proceeds <br />are the only viable method of making up the shortfall in funding <br />for the construction of the Recreation Center. Tax increment <br />revenues are allocated annually to the Agency to the extent of <br />Agency indebtedness, and are paid from the portion of taxes in <br />excess of the assessed valuation of the property within the Project <br />Area in the base year of the Project. Tax allocation bonds are <br />payable from and secured solely by tax revenues to be derived from <br />the ProjeCt Area and the use of such revenues is appropriate since <br />the Project Area will be benefitted. <br /> <br />C. THE BLIGHTING CONDITION WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA THAT TH~ <br /> EXPENDITURE OF AGENCY FUNDS WILL HELP TO ELIMINATE <br /> <br /> A high crime rate that constitutes a serious threat to <br />the public safety and welfare has been recognized by the Legisla- <br />ture as an economic condition that causes blight. Health and <br />Safety Code § 33031(b) (5). The construction of the Recreation <br />Center and the greater utilization of the Park that is expected to <br /> <br /> <br />