My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
95-024
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1995
>
95-024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:30:48 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:47:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
95-24
Date
6/20/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION 95-024 <br /> <br />Facts in Support of the Findina <br /> <br />This project alternative would have the same potential <br />environmental impacts as the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment <br />because the same public improvement and private development <br />projects could be constructed with or without the Plan Amendment. <br />This alternative may have more impacts than the proposed Plan <br />Amendment because the Redevelopment Plan Amendment could provide <br />additional financial incentives that could allow existing <br />businesses to upgrade and improve dilapidated buildings, reducing <br />existing blighted and economically depressed conditions. <br />Although the Agency can oonstruct public improvements and assist <br />private development with building upgrades, and development <br />currently with the existing Redevelopment Plan, the needed revenues <br />to accomplish these tasks are not presently availabIe from the <br />Agency. Therefore, the Plan Amendment is needed to provide <br />additional revenues by the Agency to assist theCity in improving <br />the physical and economic climate of the Project Area. This <br />alternative would also preclude the Agency from providing <br />additional assistance towards providing more low and moderate <br />income housing in the city. <br /> <br />altern&t~ve Fi~anoing <br /> <br />Findina <br /> <br />Finding <br /> <br />Specific economic, social or other considerations <br />make infeasible the mitigation measures or project <br />alternatives identified in the EIR. <br /> <br />Facts in SuPPort of the Findina <br /> <br />This project alternative would have similar environmental impacts <br />as the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment. If alternative <br />sources of financing are secured so that the same public <br />improvement and private development projects are constructed as <br />could occur with the Plan Amendment, the environmental impacts <br />would be the same. However, this alternative could be an <br />environmentally inferior project if alternative financing sources <br />are not available to construct needed public improvements and <br />assist businesses in upgrading existing dilapidated and <br />deteriorating buildings. This alternative would allow business <br />expansion and relocation assistance only as financing sources are <br />located and funds become available. The availability of funds <br />could be dependent upon the source, the marketability of revenue <br />bonds and whether or not local, state of federal agencies have <br />funds available for use by the Agency. Other methods of financing <br />include the set up of an infrastructure financing district or tax <br />revenue which may or may not be able to be accomplished and <br />implemented. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.