|
Robert Politiski-, 1002 N. Broadway, attorney for the applicant, requested a
<br />contin,,-nce to permit study of the report received regarding the General ~Plan.
<br />
<br />O~ motion of Oounc~]mau Hubbard, eeconded by Councilman Harvey and carried,
<br />Council continued the hearing to February 17, 1964 at ?:30 p.m. in the
<br />Council Chambers.
<br />
<br />HEARING - AMEND. APP. 471 Mayor Hall opened the hearing continued
<br />~3LIX)CK from December 2, 1963 on Amendment
<br /> Application 471, filed by Beulah Bullock
<br /> to reclassify from the County M i to the
<br />City R 4 District property c~ the east and west sides of Ritchey betweem
<br />Newport and ~iinger. Planning C~.~....t~sio~ Resolutic~ 5658 rec,~nded denial
<br />without prejudice pending receipt of results of study by General p~an
<br />consultants.
<br />
<br />Robert Rickles, 611 W. 8th Street, apologized for the unavoidable absence
<br />of Dale Heinly, attorney for the appellant, and requested ~ short recess.
<br />Mayor Hall explained a report from Consultant and staff regarding this property
<br />had been received and suggested it be referred to the C~,ission for review
<br />with the hearing continued.
<br />
<br />On motion of Co~ucdlw~n Hubbard, seconded by Councilman Schlueter and carried,
<br />Council continued the hearing to February 17, 1964 at 7:30 p.m. in the
<br />Council Chamber, and requested c~...'~.nt from the Plaening C..~=.tmsion regarding
<br />this applicatien in light of the reports filed by the Planni~ staff and
<br />Consultants.
<br />
<br />~ ~.
<br />HEARING - AMEND. APP. ~58 Mayor Hall opened the hearing continued
<br />AXELS0~ from November 4, 1963 on Amendment
<br /> Application 458 filed by Jule C.
<br /> Axelson, proposing to amend Sectional
<br />District Map 19-5-19 to reclassify from the M 1 to the R ~ District property
<br />on the west side of Grand between Warner and McFadden. planning COmmission
<br />Resolution 56'37 recoam~nded denial pending receipt of results of Study by
<br />General Plan consultants.
<br />
<br />Dale Heinly, 611 W. 8th Street, attorney representing the applicant,
<br />requested that a decision be made without further continuance. George
<br />Maxwell, 802 W. 8th Street reminded Council of the number of industrial
<br />representatives who had testified' against this application. Hal Wlnter~ 206
<br />W. 4th Street, and Janice Boer, 912 N. Lowell, urged the Council to leave
<br />the industrial zoning intact until the report of the General Plan consultants
<br />is received. Also speaking in opposition were George Moran, representative
<br />of the Southern Pacific Railway Cure, any; Ted Bolte, 1660 S. Mtn,~e; Cameron
<br />Dorsey, 1718 N. Towaer; and H. M. Nichols, 1~05 French Street, Assistant
<br />Superintendent of Santa Aha Unified and Junior College Districts.
<br />
<br />There being no further testimony, the hearing ~s closed.
<br />
<br />(~motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Councilman Harvey and q~rried,
<br />Council received and ordered filed letters from the Chamber of Commerce
<br />and the Santa Arm Unified School District epposing the reclassification of
<br />M 1 property to R 4. It was moved by Councilman Hubbard, seconded by
<br />Counc~lm-~ Harvey that Council deny the application without prejudice.
<br />The motion carried on roll call vote:
<br />
<br />AYES, COUNCII24EN:
<br />NOES?.', COUNCIIREN:
<br />AB~E~T, COUNCIIREN:
<br />
<br />Hubba%rd, Harvey, Gilmore, Schlueter, Hall
<br />None
<br />None
<br />
<br />CITY COUNCIL
<br />
<br />- 311 -
<br />
<br />January 20, 1964
<br />
<br />
<br />
|