|
RES. 6~-37 RESOLUTION 6~-37 OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF
<br />CONF~G ABSESSM~ THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFOENIA, MAK/NG
<br /> DETERMINATIONS AND CO~G ASSESSMenT
<br /> AND PROC..:~]INGS UND~ RESOLUTION OF
<br />~T~rION, RESOLUTION NO. 63-~9 was read by title. It was moved by Councilman
<br />Hubbard, seconded by Councilman Harvey, that further reading be waived add
<br />Resolution 6~-37 be adopted. On roll call vote:
<br />
<br />AYES, COUNCILMEN:
<br />NOES, COUNC II, EH:
<br />ABSOFT, C~3NCII2~EN:
<br />
<br />Hubbard, Harvey, Gilmore, Schlueter, Hall
<br />No~e
<br />None
<br />
<br />AMEND. APP. ~65 - Mayor Hall opened the hearing on Amendment
<br />MEP~iTn Application 465, filed by ~kldy Meredith
<br /> proposing to amend Sectional District
<br /> MaP 5-5-9 by reclassifying free the A 1
<br />to the R 3 district property on the south side of Santa Clara between Wright
<br />and Tustin Avenue. Planning C~ission Resolution 5671 rec ..... ended denial.
<br />
<br />The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published in The Register
<br />on February 29, 1964 and that letters opposing the rezoning had been received
<br />from Herbert L. Hill, 15B3 E. 19th Street, Harry Tancredi, 1104 E. 17th Street;
<br />and a petition in opposition with 144 signatures. The c~unications were
<br />received and ordered filed on motion of Councilman Hubbard, seccuded by
<br />Councilmau Schlueter and carried.
<br />
<br />Dale Heinly, 611 W. 8th Street, representing the applicant, stated that none
<br />of the persons signing the letters add petition resided within 300 feet of
<br />the area; that at the time of annexation the applicant was assured he would
<br />have no z~ming problem. He requested that the application be considered for
<br />R ~ instead of R 3 development. On advice from the Planning Director that the
<br />R 4 is a more restrictive zoning, the Council proceeded. Mr. Heinly described
<br />the proposed developeaent of fourplexes and the buffer which would be provided
<br />by the proposed park site.
<br />
<br />Patrick Dug~an, 1~02 E. 21et Street, stated he had signed the opposition petition
<br />because of misrepresentation of the location and now spoke in favor if the
<br />developer c~uld enter the area free the north, south, or east.
<br />
<br />Sally Rosaa, 133~ E. 21et Street, spoke in opposition, citing as reasons the
<br />ma,y vacancies in the area, the traffic c~ngestion, and the probable increase
<br />in school children. She also requested that action be delayed until the
<br />General Plan is c~leted, noting that it w~ul~ ceet the city more to purchase
<br />the park area if it were rezoned R ~.
<br />
<br />Noel G. Conway, 1521 E. Catalina, asked those in opposition to rise, and about
<br />hO or ~5 persons erect. Mr. Co,way stated that if the park site is rezoned R
<br />the City woul~ not have sufficient fun~e to purchase it. He suggested that a
<br />variance procedure would give better controls over the devel~l~ent.
<br />
<br />George Hare, 1610 E. 19th Street, urged that the area be retained ae choice
<br />residential, and James M. $cherer, 1~9 E. 21et Street, also spoke in opposition.
<br />Mr. ~ sp~ke a~ain stating he would be opposed to a carte blanche rezoning
<br />but would favor a variance procedure.
<br />
<br />Hrs. William E. York, 1522 E. Catalina, pointe~ out crow~ed school facilities
<br />and low water pressure as reasons for opposition.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hugh L. Wright, 2001 N. Ly~n, George Hare, 1610 E. 19~h, James M. Scherer,
<br />1529 E. 21et, and Patrick M. Hurley, 2009 N. Lyes, also spoke in opposition.
<br />The Planning Director stated the Planniu~ C~issima's recommendation was
<br />unanimous against the zone c~e as they rec:-..~.~uded R 1 usage in this area.
<br />
<br />Mr. Heinly ma~e an oral request that the westerly nine acres planned for park
<br />use he eliminated frem the application and noted none of the streets would have
<br />access westerly, but access would be frem Santa Clara. There being no further
<br />testimony, the hearing was closed.
<br />CITY COUNCIL - 343 - March 16, 196~
<br />
<br />
<br />
|