04-06-1964 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

APPEAL - H1U~TON Mayor Hall opened the heari~ on W~ll~rd H. Hilton*s appeal frc~ the Chief of Police's refusal to issue a permit to operate a taxicab. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing had been mailed to the Chief of Police and the appellant three days prior to the hearing. There being no testimcuy the hearing was closed. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Councilman Harvey and carried, Council granted the appeal and instructed the Chief of Police to issue an operator's permit to Mr. Hiltan. ~A/Jf APPEAL 124 - AGUILAR Mayor Hall opened the hearing c~ Appeal Applicatio~ 12~ filed by Joe and Eula Aguilar from the Zonin~ Administrator's denial of Variance Applicatiom 1914 to construct a second single famil.v unit on an R 1 lot which would reduce the required rear yard at 1502 W. 8th Street. The Clerk reported that evidence of giving notice of the hearing was on file in the Clerk's office and that no written cusaaunications had been received. Thomas w. Marshall, 12021 Westminster, representing the almpel!an~t, cited six lots in the block with R 2 zcuing and noted Mr. Aguilar pl---ed to put in side- walks, curbs, an~ paving. Manuel Serrano, 120~1 Westm~-ster Avenue, also spoke ~n b-bAlf of the applicant. In answer to a question from Councilman Harvey, the Acting P~-~_= Director, Mr. Stevens, reported the area to Be single f-~ly in the opinion of the Planning staff. There being no further testimony, the hearing was closed. On ~otion of C~Aucil~an HuB~ard, seconded by Councilman Schlueter and carried, Council uphel~ the action of the Zoning ~&~t-iatrator and instructed the City Attorney to prepare a' resolution denying Variance Application &>/t~ APPEAL 126 - V.A. 1~20 l~yor Hall opened the hearing on FAIRLANE HOMES Appeal 126 filed by Fairlane Hcmaes~ Inc., fron the Zeroing Administrator's denial of Variance Application 1920 to weive block wall requirement and to utilize a carport as a temporary display office at 631 S. Fairview. The Clerk reported that evidence of giving notice of the hearing was on file in the Clerk's office and that no written ¢~,-~¢ations had Been received. The Planning Director stated that at the time of the hearing before the Zoning ~istrntor, the applicant's intended p~ans were not clear].V understood; that the department now approved his proposal, subject to the conditions that the temporary sales office Be permitted for a Period not to exceed one year; and that development be according to plot plan. Les Miller, 50~ W. Edinger, of Fairlane H~aes, Inc., stated that the conditions were agreeable. There being no further response to the call for testimony, the hearing was closed. It was moved by Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Co~ucilman Schlueter and carried, that the Council overrule the action of the Zc~t~ Administrator and instruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution granting Variance Application 1920, subject to conformation with plot plan; and that the sales office Be Permitted until the last unit is sold but not to exceed one year, whichever first occurs. CITY COUNCIL - 358 - April 6, 196~