09-21-1964 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ill be granted; abuts property that probably will be zoned for s~le stol~ only. Arthur Jo G~zetta, l~ogra~ Cc~ulte~t of the State ~trea~ of Private ~nsti~u~i~ns, stressed the i~ortance of care for such patients in their own c~uity, ratJ~er than in public institutions; stat~n~ his opinion that such a facility is not incompatible with a~y zone. Don Chriateson, ~Leveloper for the appellants, described the criteria used for selectiu~ the location as bei~ ee~atibls, stating that the cemetery and area would act as buffers; that there woul~ be little traffic. Mr. Christeson gave facts concerning the 2~ sinilar hospitals in LeA o, 18 of which are in single family districts of high value; and cite~l facilities in various other cities. The~e being no further testinony, the hearing was close~l. After a discussion with the l~lanni~g Director rega~ the legality e~A feasibility of the appell-~t's pZa~ in regar~ to the Subdivision O~lin~nce~ it was ~oveel by Co~nci~--~ Gil~ore, seconded by Council~aa ~arvey and carried~ that C~cil overrule the action of the Pls~uiag Cel~ission and instruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution ~tl~, sub,oct to applicable conditions, yaria~ce Mayor Hall and Oo~ncilRan Schlueter resumed their seats at the Council table. Mr. Bueche state~ the property enmers did not sign the applicatiem; that he hoped Council in their gr~nting of application woul~ or, er revised plot plan filed in accordauee with Planning Ccumission reccgnen~ation and other steps to assure fairness to properties to the south and east. w~R~G - A.A. ~71 Xayor Mall c~ened the hearing continued ~X~OCX fr~a Sept e~ber A~li~tio~ ~71 fi~ ~ ~ ~ock to ~d Se~io~l District ~p 20-~-9 ~ ~-Z~g ~ the C~ty ~ 1 to the City ~intricta, p~y ~ b~h sides Of Rit~ s~th. P~ C~88iu Resoluti~ ~ ~c~e~ed denial. T~e Clerk reported that ne a~Aitional eeo~unications had been received. ~ls ~einly, 611 W. ~h, att~ ~ ~ ~, 363 $. C~ult~t; ~sente~ the a~li~t. ~. ~s duscrib~ the ~ea pros.al ~th the ai~ of ~p8~ ~pitu~te~ the h~l~t~ of the ~oce~o~ ~ t~ P~ ~p~nt'a s~einl st~ ~; ~g~ a~l~ s~ce the~ no ~4 f~ X 1 ~e~y, no ab~tt~ P~7 ~ern ~ ~08~, ~ the rez~ ~ ~s~lt ~ a nt~l ~e~inn of mdiu d~sity ~o~sed ~ the ~Mral P~, for a~h of ~er, east of George Me. well, Coordinator of ZuAuetrint Division of the Chauber of Ceumerce, speaking in ~positi~; re~ ~ce~ts ~ the Di~si~s ~tter to C~cil ~te~ A~st ~, 1~, not~ that M~ ~nsity ~l~t ~ the ~ri~e~ of ~ta ~ ~ ~i~ ~s~ p~r ~ the c~t~l ~eas d~tri~ t~e of the f~ ~~ Mpa su~tt~ ~ ~ne~l P~ c~sult~ts sh~ this ~a us ~st s~ted f~ ~a~ ~ose8; the ~e~y is des~ble for ~act~ becaue it c~ be se~ ~ rail ~ it is ne~ the f~s; if Aevel~ as nltiple A~I~s; it ~ be iso~te~ ~ p~eA ~si~ntial a~as; traffic probl~ w~ be ereate~; the ~sident~l a~as mt ~ sure. ed by ~ustr~l ~ to ~vide ~l~nt; the ~t st~ of ~c Rese~ Assoc~tes ~aled ~at hc~ ~ti~ ~11 decease the ~tr~l ~as, for ~ch ~ ~ A~ i8 ~cted. ~er Aisp~ a tentative ~ st~ mp te C~cil sh~ (e~l~t ~ ~dutrial ~o~ies al~ ~r, east of G~, he c~cl~d t~t ~th the ~te~i~ of ~r ud the a~ih- bility of utilities, the ~a ~11 ~ as ~tr~l pr~e~y. Cm~ ~sey~ 1~ ~. To~, ~Autr~l ~alt~, spo~ ~ ~siti~ ~caue of the · esi~bi~ty of ~e~ ~t~e for ~tr~l pr~yo Mr. l~einly, speaking in rebuttal, noted this property has been on market five years--where ars i~ustrial users; freeway and E~Lager have been know~ about; there is plenty of iwdustrial IaAA available; regarding Tentative Map, stated