Laserfiche WebLink
O~ ~oti~n of C~u~eil~an ~uhbar~l, seconded by C~ci~ $~l~ter ~ c~ie~, <br />0~eil ~e~ find repo~ ~f bi~ ~ceive~ for t~c~, one ~,~ ~ <br />~t~ ~ss~s ~ ca~ en~ ~e 2~,~ G~ ~t-~"E c~ssis ~d cab~ ~ <br />b~ ~d ~lc hoist, ~pec. ~1-~; a~ro~A a~ of c~tract f~ <br />~,~ G~ t~ck to ~te~ti~ ~-..ster C~ ~ a~ of 2~,~ G~ <br />t~ch to George ~t~ Fo~ C~; ~ ~ecte~ all other bi~s. <br /> <br />R~DS - CouncilBan Gilmore resoled his place at <br />ASPHALTXC CGJ~TE the Ce~cil tab~. ~ ~tion of C~cil- <br /> ~ ~b~, sec~ ~ Co~ci~ <br /> S~ter ~ c~ie~ C~cil o~e~ <br />filed re~ of bi~ ~cei~ for asp~ltic c~c~te ~q~nts f~ boCa-ce <br />of fiscal ye~, ~c. ~-1~; appr~e~ a~ of cont~ to J~ ~. ~ig~ <br />C~ at uit ~ices bid; -~ ~Je~ all o~er bi~s. <br /> <br />R~D - (hi llotion of Co~cilB~n K~bbard~ seconded <br />~ LIG~ by C~ci~ Schlueter ~ c~i~, <br />~$ C~cil ~e~ filed repo~ <br /> receive~ for st~t ~t <br />~c. ~2~ a~e~ a~ of c~tract to ~e~-Rite C~ at ~it prices <br />bid; ~d reJe~ all ~er bi~. <br /> <br />HEARI]G - APPEAL 136 Mayor Ksll was disqwalified from diacussic~ <br />1PAMULAR0 - V.A. 1~ ~ acti~ ~ this Mtter ~cauae of a <br /> c~lict of ~te~st, ~ le~ the C~cil <br /> table. Vice-~ ~b~ op~ the <br />he~ ~ ~al 1~6 fiCA ~ A. ~. ~ ~1~ ~re, ~ the <br />C~sai~'s d~al of Vat.ce A~licati~ 1~ to c~st~ct a hospital for <br />~e c~ u~ t~a~nt cf geriatrics, psychiatric8 ~d sit.slice ~ the <br />~iatri~ at ~20 E. ~a C~. ~e Cbrk ~po~eA ~at a~ice of the he~s <br />~s ~ibA to ~aeut pro~y ~ers ~ Se~e~er 1~, 1~, ~ t~t the <br />fo~ ~oe~ c~icatl~ ~ ~ ~cei~: letters ~ ~ls ~d <br /> <br />~er of p~y ~ ~t ~et; ~ ~titi~ ~th a~r~te~ <br />s~at~es ~ aei~ ~ei~ts. ~e c~cati~ ~ o~ fi~ <br />on ~i~ of C~ci~ ~ sec~eA ~ C~ci~ Schl~ter, ~ c~ieA. <br /> <br />Clark P. iller, ~ Santiago, representing the appellant, presented naps and <br />i~fo~tien on rest he~es end hospitals ia Les A~geles C~ty a~A ia vicinity <br />of Santa A~a. <br /> <br />Robert Stauffer; 1~1~ E. l~th, stated that the appellants had not sh~m that <br />the land wis uns~itabls for other uses; and that haA~lship to the owner A~I .... <br />not exist; that the Plannin~ Cemaisei~a and Master plm~ ind~cate~ the area as <br />R 1 area; that a check with St. ~osephts l~ospital found they accepted this <br />type of care f~ treat~eat of short duration oal~. <br /> <br />J. Eltoa De. se, 1~01 E. 20~h, stated that fren his office on 17th Street he <br />has eccasic~all~ seen patients wander fr~- a nearby coavalsscent h~ae tewar~ <br />the Rewp~rt lereeway, anA that attea~a~ts ~ust go after the~. Re objected to <br />the possibility of such happe~w~ i~ the resideatial area. <br /> <br />Frank Baeche, 1~21 E. 17th, represe~tiwg developers of Tract 56~0, Rosa <br />Schrader, read excerpts fren the p~a~.~.~ Staff's ce~eats dated August, 1~o~; <br />demied that Santa Clara is a ceaeaercial street; state~ the area is pre~lneatly <br />R 1, having been so zcae~l by the Council ~pon a~--vatien. Mr. B~eche q~oted <br />froR the Municipal Co~ets defiaitio~ of a convalescent hospital; and rest <br />hcam~ pointed o~t that requirements for a variance were not ut, and it <br />therefore should be denle~. <br /> <br />Co~ucil~&n Sehl~eter was ~isqualified fr~ discussion ~A acti~ ~ this <br />~tter because of a c~li~ of ~te~s~, ~ ~ the C~c~l table. <br />?~r, 7~ E. S~ta C~a~ ~p~s~t~g the ~heast S~ta ~ Resi~nts <br />Associati~, s~ ~ ~ositi~, a~er ~i~ ~. ~ller spo~ in ~buttal; <br />s~ t~t the a~ra~ st~ of ~tients ~ this t~e of faci~ty is ~ <br />of the fi~ ac~s; a~te~ 2~ ~11 be b~lt u~; a ~ter ~e eas~nt <br />C~ C~ ~ - ~7 - Se~er 21, <br /> <br /> <br />