01-18-1965 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ARII~ - Mayor ~all opened the hearing on A~ea~aent A.A. 532 CONXLI~ Application ~2 ftle~ ~ Grace ~. C~ to mn~ Secti~l Dietri~ hp 6-5-9 ~ rechssi~ ~m R 1 to the R 1 B ~istrict~ pro~y ~ the s~ath si~e of hta C~a~ ~' east of Gr~. P~ C~olon Reso~ti~ 5%6 responded a~r~l of ~ibit A.A. ~ A. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published lm The Register oa January 2, 1~5 and that a letter ha~ bees received fre~ ~rSo ~ar~l~ Ncaaa, Vice P~esi~ent of the Santa A~a-East Rle~mer's Association, calling attentiou to ~the traffic problem in the area, a~ a copy of a letter to the City Attorney requesting c~aeideratie~ of all the legal requirements particularly the filing of a tract ~apo The letters were ordered file~l on ~etion of C~cil~ma ~bbard, sec~nde~ by Councilman Schlueter a~d carried. The City Attorney stated that ia Santa Ane there is no co~nectio= to a zone chemge a~ the filin~ efa snb&iviaion ~aap~ that the Council is legally entitled te consider a z~ae change without a~y re~ard to the Snb~ivisi~u #ap Act. Leo Coasidine, 811 N. ~readway, Rector G~iaez, pestaaaster~ aud Nichar~ Wi~cer, lqegi~al Officer, U. S. Post ~ffice, sp~ce on Behalf of the application, noting the need for additional parW~ng for the increase~ size of the build,n=_ to met City requirements; that the rezoning is not inconsistent vith the ~eneral Ptaw aa proposed; that vith the exception of deliveries to the i~ediate area, Santa Clara will not be ued By postal vehicles ° Arthur Perkins, 1~1~ E. 20th, President of Santa Aaa East We~eo~ners Associatiou, spoke in opposition because of increased truck traffic entering the facility via Santa Clara and Wright Straets; requeste~ postponement antil prelim. amp is filed and reviewed by all de, artfonts ° Noel CIW, 1521 E. Catalina, Vice President of the Association, state~ he was i~for~aed that no preliminary =ap ~s fil~ ~en ~e ~cel a~ z~ C ~s sg~, ~ he as~ t~ City Atto~ if ~icipal C~e Secti~ ~0 re~ iaa~ce ~f b~ ~its or other o~icial acts w~ a~ to the ch~. ~e City Att~ ~plied he that the~ ~ be no ~ti~ship bergen the two. ~. C~y s~e~te~ the Ae~l~nt ~e ~ ~ee se t~fic c~ be c~trol~d ~ ~ ~ case t~t the ~tter be cmt~ ~il the ~1~ ~p cat,es ~ ~th the z~ leraa]~ ~aeche, 1~21 Eo 17th, representing Russell Nohrs~ stated that when the first parcel was sold no ~ap was file&$ that a nep has m~w been filed the original oale aud the cae n~ ~3aler ccasiAeratica; a~A he rece~mge~ that the ~ap procedure be followed first o ~rs. ~ar~ld Noea~, 15~ Eo 21st~ ~eined in the pr~cest a~a~at the a~licati~ · tat~ t~t t~ re~ts of Seoti~ ~7~ ~t be ~er~ to ~ t~t ~ R~ ~e sh~ be ~is~seA, n~ Post ~fice use. ]Ir. Coaeidine simms briefly ia rebuttal, stating that the ~est ~ffice coul~l buy ~ oud buil~ its ewa buil~ingo There be~_= ne further test ,i~ay, the hearing was cloeedo It ~a~ ~aoveA By Ccuncil~a~ ~ubbard~ seccaded by C~uucil~m 8chl~eter a~l carrie~, that C~ctl approve the reclesstficati~ a~d instruct the City Attorney to prepare aa a~e~i~ or~ance according to Exhibit A oA. 532 A. ~ . May~r ~all opened the hearing ~a the ~ D~. ~opcae~ ~t of ~e ~a~ ~ee ~ 1~ by ~opt~ a ~w ~ ~p~ce a~ ~ist~g ~istri~ of the s~ ~esi~ti~ ~d c~ta~ revis~ e~rati~l ~ site ~e~l~at st~s. ClT~ C~V~ClL - lk~ - January