04-16-1965 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

policy of the Coucil; a~l CegmLission regax~li~ rear ~ ~re& ~n ~ square foot lots. v~ rebuttal; Mr. Katnik stated that lava and rules change; that Oouncil has discretionary power to regulate variance per~issi~l~ that in c~trast to us~l opposition, neighbors suppox~ced the applicant; that neighbors were disappointed at & recent re~ lmer~ltti~g an addition ~ver a garage vben a b&ck~A~l ad~itic~ ~ have been preferreA. Chief Garthe of the Fire Depar~ent outline~l the following points: Fire (epa.-tnents request ~ ~ se~ti~ f~ access to f~t f~ ~ f~ pr~e~i~ of ne~b~ h~es. a ~ater ~ to ~ ~b~ q~er8 wi~ fi~ fe~ ~f a pro~y l~e. c~ ~t ~ite ~e ~ ~t ~stigat~ ~e c~t~ces. O~ci~ ~k ~ ~. ~ta~ if ~ ~ n~ ~t to neg~iate ~th his client ~a~ as ~ ~ ~t~ ~ sq~re feet of the additi~ ~queste~. ~. ~tnik aske~ for a ~cisi~. It was ~ve~ by Ceuacilean ~rook~, sec~ed by C~ncil~s~ Burk that Couucil ~verrule the actl~ of the Zon~ A~ainistrator a~ ~-atruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution ~ra~ting Variance 20~1 subject to applicable cc~iti~s. The motion was lost Gu roll call vote: AYES, IOES, C~CXLH~z · ~ C~NCXL~z A~STA~ Brooks, B~rk; ~errin Gilmore, ~arkel, Barvey Xc~ichael Mr. Eatn~ requested a continuance but was ~*orne~ by ~ayor wa-wey that he was ~ut of ~rAer since the hearing was closed a~A the ~r~i~a was ~eclareel lost. was uoveA by Councilman Markel, seco~Ae~ by Couuciluan Br~oks that Council recousider aba poss the entire uatter back to the staff to negotiate. Co~u¢il~a~ Gilmore stated the hazards of foLl~elug ench a pr~ce~ure, since it ~pe~e~l the ~oer f~r all disatlsfte~l appel~-nts. Dale ~einl~ ~11 W. Sth~ expressed the opinion that since there had been a tie vote, it vas a~visable to continue the matter for fu~her study. Mayor Harvey x~u~[ed Mr. Hainl~ that a tie vote is a lost The ~cien to recc~siAer was lost on roll call vote. AYES, C~CXL~E~ Br~eks, Harrin, ~arksl · OES~ C~C~ Gilmore, ~ark, ~arvey A~S~T, C~C~ None ABSTAXN~ COU~CXLI~J: Kc~ichael /$ ~EARI~G - Hasting was opened c~ Appeal 1~1 APPEAL 161 fileA by the Public Works Director (¥.A. 20~9) rrm the P~-~,~,,_~ ¢ca~issim's &ppr~val of Varig'ace Application filed by G,L.A. DeveleI~emt Co. to ce~str~c~ a service station in the R 1 district at 1~9 S. The Clerk repor~eql that no, ice of the hearing was mailed to 8dJacent property owners ca April ~ 1~ enel that no written cce~atnicati~as h~l haen receiveA. The l~J~llc l~'~'ks Director stated after meeting with the interested lmrties, an agreeBent baa been reached regorAing the plot p~-~, aml recamend~ that the variance be gra~ted with a ~lifieatien of C~aditien 7 an~ an additional c~itio~ regarding EAlnger i~prove~ents. EAvar~ ~rhe; 1~ S. 3itch, protested construction of a gasoline station so close to his h~me. There being no further testiuo~; the hearing was closed. CITY COUNCIL - 2~0 - April 1~; 1~