|
I:
<br />
<br />approve the reclessificatiea and inotraet the City Attorney te prepare a~
<br />a~endi~g ~rAinanee according to E~hibit ~A :5~ A. On roll call vote:
<br />
<br />AYES, C~NCIL~EN:
<br />NOES, COUNCIL~:
<br />AESE~T, CO~CILNE~:
<br />A~STAXN,
<br />
<br />Gila=re, Breoks, B~rk, Herrin, Markel, FA=.~y
<br />McMichael
<br />
<br />HEAIt~G - Hearing was openeA ~a Appeal 1~ file~
<br />APPF~L 1~ ~ ~a~-*~ ~s~ts ~
<br />(V.A. ~) ~ita ~s, ~c., ~ the
<br /> P~ C~ssi~'a ~ial of V~ce
<br />A~cati~ 2~ to c~t~ct a 93 ,.-~t a~t c~ ~ the A 1 ~strict
<br />at ~61~ W. ~c~. ~e Clerk ~p~e~ t~ n~ice ~f the he~ ~s ~ile~
<br />to adjacent pr~y ~ers ~ April ~, 1~, ~d t~t ac ~itten e~i~ti~
<br />~ been recei~.
<br />
<br />Dale Heir, 611 W. ~h, representing the appellR-t, reTaeste~ centi~-A, Ce
<br />until th· next meeting.
<br />
<br /> motion of Counc~lm- ~arkel, seceded By C~cil~an Werrin ~ carrie~,
<br />C~ncil cc~tinue~ the heart,_= to May 3, 1965 at 7:30 porn. in the Council
<br />
<br />/$
<br />HEAKI~} - Hearin6 was ~peaed en Appeal 1~9 filed
<br />APPEAL 159 by A. R. a~d Helena Fam~laro frc~ the
<br />(V.A. 2099) P~A~-~-_= Commission's denial of Variance
<br /> Application ~099 to construct a hospital
<br />for the care ~ treatment of geriatrics, psychiatrics and alcholics in the
<br />R 1 district at 1~20 Eo Santa C~a~a. The Clerk reported that notice of the
<br />hearing was meile~ to a~Jacent ~r~y ~wners o~ April 13~ 196~, a~A letters
<br />in ~pposition baa been received fren Esther aud ~ar~ha Sex~-~r, 16~12 E.
<br />Santa Clara, ~rs. Ja~es Go Toepfer, President, Sierra PTA, 1509 E. Washimgtc~,
<br />and Louis an~[ Helene Young, 1628 S. Santa
<br />
<br />The Clerk presented a letter fr~a Jack J. l~imel, attorney for the applicant,
<br />request~_= withdrawal of the application ~ecause the escrow ha~ been cancelle~.
<br />
<br />On m~ci~ of Councilman Gilmore, sec~n~e~ by C~uuc~--~ Br~uks an~ carrie~,
<br />Council ordere~ the letters file~ a,& declarecl procee~ings on Variance
<br />
<br />Application 2099 terminate~l.
<br />
<br />~RING -
<br />APPEAL 160
<br />(VoAo
<br />
<br />lleari~6 was o~eme~, en Appeal 160 file~
<br />by Jer~ J. a~ ~lad~s R. ~ere fr~a
<br />the Z~m~g A~-istrntor's ~enial of
<br />Variance Application 2091 to c~ustr~ct
<br />
<br />a r~a a~itien that encroaches into required rear yar~ at 3016 W. El~ero
<br />The Clerk reported that notice of the hear~ was maile~ to ad~acant property
<br />owmere on April 12th, a~t that no written c~uicati~s had been received.
<br />
<br />Eugene Eat~ik, 120~ N. Br~dway, attoxney representing the appellant, sub~/tted
<br />a petition with 1~ signatures of nei~b~ring property e.~ere who d/~ not
<br />object tO the proposed encroacluaent. On ~aotien of Co~tuc~l~n Gilmore, secenAe~l
<br />By Council--- Brooks amd carrie~, Council ox~ere~ the petition fileel.
<br />Mr. ~at~ik also submitted a letter frc~ his client's t-=ura~ce cca~u~ which
<br />state~ that ~ a~d/tic~al rate in insurance w~ald be re~t-e~. On ~ti~ of
<br />Co~u~cil~aa Gilmore, sec~e~l By C~ucil~a~ Brooks an~ carrie~l, the letter
<br />was erdere~ file~. Nrc Eatnih reviewe~ his conversation with Fire ~arshall
<br />Dachtelle, who state& that a patio c~verage was more hazardous than a roc~
<br />a~diti~ with a firevall. He state~ that a two hour firewall was p~--~d,
<br />--~ a rock an~ tar r~of. There bei~6 no furt~ertesti~e~y, the heur~ was
<br />closed.
<br />
<br />The Planning Director gave the historical backgrcunA of the area and previous
<br />
<br />ClT~ C~CIL - 229 - April 19, 196~
<br />
<br />
<br />
|