Laserfiche WebLink
Fritz Stradling, ~01%;. 8th, attorney representing the applicant, spoke in favor. <br />T~ere being no further testim~ay, the hearth_= was close&. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 6~-133 ORDERING VACATION OF A PORTION OF STREET RIGHT OF WAY ON 'l'-.: <br />S(F~fH SIDE OF EDI~G~ Av~E, 18~ F~r WEST OF FL(YWER STI~T~'£, AI~ RESERVING <br />T~D~IN A PUBLIC ~TILITIE8 EAS~ was rea~ by title. It was moved by <br />Counc~lm~- Burk, seconded by C~,-cilm~- ~ilmore, that further read~_=, be waived <br />and Resolution 65-133 be a~opted. On roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES, <br /> <br />NOES, <br />AESmx£, COU~C II~E~: <br /> <br />0ilmore, Brooks, Burk, Herrin, Markel, <br />NcMichael, Harvey <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />SIDEWALK CO~BTR. R~yal Eo ~Abbar(1, 1010 N. Main St o, <br /> requested clarification of C~uncil <br /> actioa August 2, 1965 regardi~ <br /> condemnation action with T. R. Bolte <br />Develol~aent Co. for E~inger Project 173, ~eclaring that through~ut the <br />discussions he ha~l always ha~ in m/nd the coastruction of sidewal¥~ on both <br />Ed~n~5=er and Gran~. The P~hlic Works Director stated that costs presented to <br />Council had included sidew~q~ on Edinger c~ly. Couucil~an Brooks stated that <br />in his motion he had Been referri~ to Ed/rigor c~llyo <br /> <br />It was moved by C~Amcilmsa Brooks, secomde~ by C(r~acilmma M~rkel and carrie~l that <br />the Council sustain the Public Works Director a-& appl~ the sidewalk issue to <br />E~t-_=er Street om]v, for Project 173o <br /> <br />REI~SE COLLECTI0~[ It was moved By Councilman Markel~ <br /> secom~l by Counci~m-- Brooks, <br /> that the proposed ordinance regulating <br /> refuse collection procedures be <br />postponed to the neetimg of September 7, 196~ for further study. The motion <br />'carried, with C~uacilmen B~--------rk omd Herrin voting No. <br /> <br />The Planning Director reported on <br />the South Main I~rove~ent Association's <br />request for change in street numbering <br />syste~ on the west side of Main <br />between McFa~len an~ ~k]~n_=er. He pointed out that the F~anicipal Co(fo allows a <br />number for every 25 feet; that 11 of the 26 changes requested could be mmic, but <br />to ac~m~Aate the 11 would require changing 72 nmabers o <br /> <br />It was moved by C~uncilman McMic~ael, secom~e~ hy C~unci~-=- Bark and carried <br />that a hearing be held at the hooting of September 20~ 1965 an~ all businesses <br />affected be notified. <br /> <br />C~OSSWALK The Public Works Director stated <br /> that after investigating the request <br /> fr~ employees om E~st First Street <br /> for a crosswalk between Grana and <br />I~om, a crosswalk was warrante~ an~ would be placed across First Street at the <br />east side of ~cClay Street. <br /> <br />PP~E. REC. OF ~ ~26 On motion of Councilman Br~ks, <br /> secomde~ by C~4acilman Nerrin ~ <br /> c~i~, Co~cil approved, subject <br /> to c~lti~s ~tl~ed ~ the P~ <br />D~ctor's ~po~ ~t~ ASsr 9, 1~5, ~e~ Recor~ of S~y ~26 file~ <br />~ Do~ N~c~ creat~ ~o A 1 p~ce~ ~ the ~st si~ of ~t~, ~o~h of <br />S~a C~a, ~d ~i~ alley ~quire~nt. <br />C~ C~ - 330 - A~st 16, 1~5 <br /> <br /> <br />