|
seconded by C~uncilmam Breok~, that the resolutions be adopted. On roll call
<br />vote:
<br />
<br />AYES, COUNC ILI~:
<br />
<br />NOES, COUNCILMEN:
<br />ABSENT, COUNC IIREN:
<br />
<br />Gilmore, Brooks~ Burk, Herrim, Markel,
<br />McMichael, Harvey
<br />None
<br />Nome
<br />
<br />CUP 201 The continued hearing was opened on
<br />DUCOT Conditional Use Peri,it 201 filed by
<br /> George Ducot to coustruct a rest hmme
<br /> in the R i district at 1605 N. ~-glish,
<br />which the Planning Cc~mzission had approved. The Clerk reported that letters
<br />were received from the following: William J. amd Lucille Frances, 1429 N.
<br />English, and Hubert C. Pattersan, 1930 W. 15th, pr~testing the application;
<br />a letter frc~ Thcs. P. McGuimmss, 13672 Rushmore Lane, statlag he had been
<br />erroneousl~ listed as a property owner; and a petition of protest with
<br />approximately ~9 signatures. The Clerk read a letter fram F~rs. Wm. Owen,
<br />2016 W. 15th, calling attention to the fact that all owners of property
<br />within 300 feet had not been notified and requestiD~ an opinion frc~ the
<br />City Attorney. Om motion of C~uncilma~ McMichael, seceded by Council~mn
<br />Burk amd carried, Council ordered the letters filed.
<br />
<br />The City Attorney stated that apparently the original application did mot
<br />contain all of the names which were legally required to be notified; that
<br />the Council could not be attacked in C~urt for referral back to the Planning
<br />C~mmissiQn. Mrs. Wm. Owen, 2016 W. 15th, suggested that since notification
<br />was ii,proper, the proceedimgs should be declared null and void.
<br />
<br />Om motion of Councilman Brooks, seconded by Counci]~- Gilmore and, carried,
<br />Council referred the matter back to the Plsaning Commission with the under-
<br />standing that the applicant reapply at no additional cost.
<br />
<br />Ar.T.k~f ABANDOS~4ENT Hearing was opened on proposed
<br />RES. 65-1~3 abandonment of a l~-foot alley between
<br /> Main and Cypress, south of Bishop.
<br /> The Clerk reported that notice of
<br />the hearing had been published and posted as required by law with evidence
<br />thereof ~n file, and that no written com~4unications had been received.
<br />There being no response to the Mayor's call for testimony, the hearing was
<br />closed.
<br />
<br />RESOLUTION 65-143 O~DERING VACATION OF A 14-FOOT ALLEY BETWEEN MAIN AND
<br />CYPRESS, SODTH OF BISHOP, AND RESERVING THEREIN A PUBLIC UTILITY EAS~Z~T
<br />was rea~ by title. It was moved by Coancllmaa Brooks, seconded by Councilman
<br />Burk, that further reading be waived and Resolution 65-143 be adopted.
<br />roll call vote:
<br />
<br />AYES, COUNCI~:
<br />
<br />NOES, COUNCILMEN:
<br />ABSENT, COUNCII24EN:
<br />
<br />Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Herrin~ Markel,
<br />McMichael, Harvey
<br />None
<br />None
<br />
<br />AMEND. APP. 550 Continued hearing was opened on Amend-
<br /> ment Application 550 filed by Clara
<br /> Vose proposing the amendment of
<br /> Sectional District Map 2-5-10by
<br />reclassifying from R i mad A I to A l, R ~, LP, CD, C 4 and C ~ B districts~
<br />property south of Memory Lane, west of Bristol. Planning Commission
<br />Resolution 5742 recommended approval of Exhibit AA 550 C, which would
<br />reclassify to the E l, R ~, amd LP districts. The Clerk reported that no
<br />communications had been received other than the ~th revised plan submitted
<br />to Council.
<br />CITY COUNCIL - 359 - September 20, 1965
<br />
<br />
<br />
|