|
Dean Evans, 510 W. Chapman, Orange, Planning Consultant representing the
<br />applicant, summarized his long range study of proposed land use filed with
<br />the C~uacil; displayed maps of the suggested plans, indicating the fourth
<br />pla~ as the one most suitable to the applicant, and the fifth plan as that
<br />suggested by the Planning Co~ission.
<br />
<br />John Harvey, 1010 N. Main, attorney for the applicant, gave i%zrther history
<br />of the application, regarding one of the few remaining large areas left in
<br />central Santa A~a; the Plamuin~ Co~mission's action thereon; and urged that a
<br />decision be made.
<br />
<br />Speaking im opposition, Dr. Joh~ Holiday, 1223 River Lane, urged the residential
<br />area be maintained; Damiel Cohen, 1R22 River Lane~ agreed amd stated the lack
<br />of attendance did not mean owners were not vitally interested; Virgil Elkims,
<br />2210 N. Poplar, objected t® a~y development which would have a low tax base.
<br />There being no further testimo~y~ the hearing was closed.
<br />
<br />Coumcil discussed various viewpoints, Councilm~n McMichael supporting R 1
<br />zoning with a possible variance for the~rmer, Councilm~a B~ooks and B~rk
<br />suppertfng the applicant's plan as well thought out.
<br />
<br />It was moved by Councilm-- Brooks, seconded by C~nc~lman Burk, that C~cil
<br />approve the reclassification and instruct the City Attorney to prepare an
<br />amending ordinance according to Exhibit AA 550 A Revised. Oa roll call vote:
<br />
<br />AYES, COUNCILMEN:
<br />NOES, COUNCILMEN:
<br />ABSENT, COUNC IIRF~N:
<br />
<br />Gilmore, B~ooks, Bmrk, Herrim, Markel, Har~ey
<br />McMichael
<br />None
<br />
<br />ASSESS. DIST. 229 Continued hearing w~s opened on
<br /> Resolution of Intention 65-119 a~d
<br /> Resolution 65-118 to determine
<br /> public convenience and necessity
<br />of proposed work in Assessment District 229 (Kent, Elliott, Edinger, Newhope).
<br />Johm T. Ganahl, Special C~uusel for the City, explained the p~ose of the
<br />hearing.
<br />
<br />The Public Works Director reported on the proposed work, extent of proposed
<br />assessment district, the one bid received which was higher tha~ Engineer's
<br />estfm-te, amd the reason for the proposed work. He recommended that the one
<br />bid received for installation of sewer be rejected as too high amd authority
<br />be grouted to readvertise. The Clerk reported that no written protests had
<br />been received. There being no response to the call for oral protests, the
<br />hearing was closed.
<br />
<br />RESOLUTION 65-151 DETERMINING TNAT THE PURT.!C CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
<br />REQUIRE IMPROV~4ENT WORK, AND ORDERING WORK, ASSESS~E~ DISTRICT NO. 229,
<br />SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, was read by title. It wns moved by Councilman Gilmore,
<br />seconded by Councilman Brooks, that further reading be waived and Resolution
<br />65-151 be adopted. Oa roll call vote:
<br />
<br />AYES, COUNCIIR~N:
<br />
<br />NOES, COUNCILMEN:
<br />ABSENT, COUNCILMEN:
<br />
<br />Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Nerrin, Markel,
<br />McMichael, Harvey
<br />None
<br />None
<br />
<br />RESOU3TION 65-152 REJECTING BIDS AND AUTHORIZING READVERTIS~E~ ASSESSME/tT
<br />DISTRICT NO. 229, SANTA ANA, C~LI~ORNIA was read by title. It was moved by
<br />
<br />Councilman Gilmore, seconded
<br />waived and Resolution 65-152
<br /> AYES, COUNCILMEN:
<br />
<br />NOES, COUNCILMEN:
<br />ABSE/~i', COUNCILMEN:
<br />
<br />by Couacilma~ B~rk, that fu-~ther reading be
<br />be adopted. Om roll call vote:
<br /> Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Herrim, Markel,
<br /> McMichael, Harvey
<br /> Nome
<br /> N~ae
<br />
<br />CITY COUNCIL
<br />
<br />- 360 -
<br />
<br />September 20, 1965
<br />
<br />
<br />
|