01-03-1966 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Planning Director, in answer to Councilman Gilmore's question regarding the change fro~ C 1 to C 5 and the dedications said that the Ccm~ission had rejected C 5; that had a proposal for R i for the corner service station site been included, the station could have ~eehl :~m&iti~aeel .~ .varianCes: ~Jm~-~eEa,~.~to the dedication, the Planning Director explained the Comm~ission's problem that when a picture and statements are submitted by the applicant, the Commission has no legal way to assure residents surrounding the area that what is proposed will be done. That after the applicant made these things occur the Cam~ission still was of a majority opinion that it was not proper place for commercial zone. Mr. Del Michael, 917 S. To]and, representing the Southwest Santa Ana Homeowners Association, spoke in opposition to the amendment application, noting there had been no cc~mercial zoning on this street within ½ mile since the residential area was built. There beimg no further testimony, the hearing was closed. Councilman McMichael related the history of the area since annexation, noting the residents in the area requested a special study and the Commission and Council adopted Special Study 19 which is still operating. Councilman McMichael requested that any changes be made by special study or general plan rather than spot zoning. It was moved by Councilmsn McMichael, seconded by Councilman Brooks that the decision of the Planning Commission be upheld and Amendment Application 570 be denied. The motion was adopted on roll call vote: AYES, C0UNCII/4EN: NOES, C OUNC ~: ABSENT, COUNCII~EN: Brooks, Markel, McMichael, Harvey Gilmore, Bu_rk, Herrin None NEARING - Hearing was opened on Amendment A.A. 571 - PLANNING Application 571'initiated by the CO~[ISSION Planning C~ission proposing the amendment of Sectional District Map lO-5-10 by reclassifying from the R 2 to the R 2 B district property on the east and west sides of Figmeroa between Hazard and First. Planning Commission Resolution 5760 recommended approval. The Clerk reported thatnotice of the hearing was published December 18, 1965, affidavit of publication was on file~ and that no written communications had been received. There being no response to the Mayor's call for testimony, the hearing was closed. On motion of Councilman Markel, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, Council approved the reclassification and instructed the City Attorney to prepare an amending ordinance according to Exhibit AA 571 A. HEARING - Hearing was opened on Amendment A.A. 572 - CORRY Application 572 filed by Rosabelle Corry proposing the amendment of Sectional District Map 15-5-10 by reclassifying from R l, R i B and C 2 districts to the C i district property on the west side of Feirview between First and Camile. Planning Commission Resolution 5758 recommended approval of Exhibit B which would reclassify to the C 5 and R i B districts. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published December 18, 196~ and no written communications had been received. Mr. Roger McCune, 1505 E. 17th, representing Mrs. Corry, explained to Council that a shopping center was proposed for the property thus serving approximately 850 mobile homes nearby. Mrs. Corry submitted a petition to Council favoring theshopping center from residents in the area. On motion of Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, Council ordered the petition filed. Mr. Del Michael, 917 S. Toland, asked if there were any plans or intentions to hold Fairview as a commercial street and the Planning Director replied in the negative. There being no further testimony~ the hearing was closed. CIT~ COUNCIL - 438 - January 3, 1966