My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-1966
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1966
>
01-17-1966
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:01:21 PM
Creation date
4/28/2003 2:49:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/17/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vice Mayor GiLmore presented Father John J. Reilly of Mater Dei High School <br />with a resolution congratulating the football team on winning the California <br />Interscholastic Federation Football Championship. ~embers of the team and <br />coaching staff were introduced. <br /> <br />HEARING - Hearing was opened on Amendment <br />AA 576 - SCHECK Application 576 filed by Joseph <br /> N. Scheck proposing the amendment <br /> of Sectional District Nap <br />by reclassifying from the R 1 to the C 2 district property north of Edinger <br />between Bristol and Magnolia. Planning Commission Resolution 5761 recommended <br />denial. The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing had been published <br />January 6, 1966 in The Register and affidavit of publication was on file, and <br />that no written communications had been received. <br /> <br />Mr. Joseph N. Scheck, the applicant, stated that he was not able to have any <br />lights or signs on his property with the present variance; that his property <br />was across from a school, and in front of a gas station. Councilman Burk <br />asked the Planning Department what the fundamental objection was to zoning a <br />property C i or C 2 that is being used commerciall~v, and that could not be <br />used for a residence. The Planning Director reported that the assumption was <br />that a c~mmercial activity without restriction is not considered desirable in <br />an R i zone; that if the property were rezoned the buildings could be removed <br />and full commercial structures erected. There being no further testimony, <br />the hearing was closed. <br /> <br />It was moved by Councilman McMichael, seconded by CounciLman Herrin and carried, <br />that the findings of the Planning Commission be upheld and the reclassification <br />be denied. <br /> <br />HEARING - Hearing was opened on Resolution <br />GLASSELL & FAIRHAVEN 65-194 proposing annexation of land <br />N.E. ANNEX described as Glassell and Fairhaven <br /> Northeast Annex. The Clerk reported <br />notice of the hearing was published and mailed as required by law and evidence <br />thereof was on file. There being no response to the Mayor's call for <br />testimony, the hearing was closed. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 66-11 DECLARING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY DESIGNATED "GLASSELL <br />AND FAI_RHAVENNORTHEAST ANNEX" TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA was read by title. <br />was moved by Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman Gilmore that further <br />reading be waived and Resolution 66-11 be adopted. On roll call vote: <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />AYES~ COUNCILMEN: <br /> <br />NOES~ COUNCILM~I: <br />ABSENT, COUNCILMEN: <br /> <br />Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, Herrin, Markel, <br />McMichael, Harvey <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />APPEAL 172 Hearing was opened on Appeal 172 <br />VA 2200 - GRIFFIN filed by Harold Griffin appealing <br /> one of the conditions imposed by <br /> the Planning Commission in its <br />approval of Variance Application 2200 to use two R 2 lots for off-street parking <br />and a metal building for storage at ll3 N. Gunther. The Clerk reported that <br />notice of the hearing was mailed to adjacent property owners January ll~ 1966 <br />and no communications had been filed. <br /> <br />Mr. Griffin, the applicant, stated that he had acquired the two lots in question <br />for parking; that it is not necessary that they have all of the space for <br />parking at the present time, and asked for approval for the use of the metal <br />building which is now on the property for use as storage space. The Planning <br />Director reported this commercial property, as well as other similar properties <br />in a ccmmercial strip of this type, is too small to provide adequate parking; <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL - ~49 - January 17, 1966 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.