06-06-1966 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

AYES~ COUNCII~EN ~ NOES, C0~NC ILMEN: ABS~r~ C(7JNC IL~EN ~ Gilmore~ Brooks~ Burk, Herrin~ Narkel~ NcNichae 1, Harvey None None MAYW00D S~T VACATIOH Hearing was opened on proposed vacation of a portion of Naywood A~enue~ east of Yale Street° The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published in The Register on May 21~ 1966~ was posted in the area on May 26, 1966 add that evidence thereto w~s on file; that no written c~unications had been filed, but that the Director of Public Works had requested that this hearing be continued so that it might run conc%~rrently with a final tract map of the area. On motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Burk and carried, the hearing was continued to June 20, 1966~ 7:30 pomo in the Council Chambers. CLUBHOUSE Rearing was opened on an appeal filed by The Never On Friday Club, petitioning the City Council to waive portions of the Fmnicipal Co~e regarding issuance of a public ~ance permit in Fashion Lanes Shopping Center. The Clerk reported that a letter had been received frc~ the appellant requesting that the appeal be withdrawn° On motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Mm~kel and carried, the matter was removed from the agenda. C~C~IAL RABBIT YARD Council received an evaluation report from the Orange County Health Department regarding application for permit to maintain rabbits at 1426 Sullivan~ submitted by Robert Do Beckwitho The report indicated that with the exception of work to be done on hutches for convenience of cleaning, the facilities essentially meet the provision of sub-section (a) (b) and (f) of Municipal Cc(lo Section 4121.1. Council also received a petition from owners and residents within approximately 300~ of the property objecting to the continuance of the rabbit farm on the property~ Attorney Robert Rickles, represented the applicant, stating that reguLations have been met and requesting the permit be issued. Attorney John H~ Gilbert~ Jr., representing Mr. Hubert Melton, 14~6 So Sullivan~ one of the opponents, stated that the use causes excessive flies and odors; devaluates nearby property, and is a nuisance° The Planning Director stated there was a question as to whether or not a prior non-conforming use ha~ been maintained continuously° On motion of Councilman McMichael, seconded by Councilman Brooks ami c~rried, the matter was continued to June 20~ 1966 and the staff requested to investigate and report back with a recummen~ation. APPEAL 176, VA 66-31 Hearing was opened on appeal filed by Walter R. Giles and John Bre~er of the Planning Commission's approval of Variance Application 66-31 filed by William Moss to construct a 6' high fence in required front yard at 94~ W. Buffalo. The Clerk reported that notice of hearing was mailed to adjacent property owners May 31, 1966 and evidence thereto was on file. The Clerk also reported that a petition in opposition to ~ranting the variance~ signed by approximately 23 persons, had been filed° ClTY C0~N¢IL ° 5~3 ~ Jude 6, 1966