06-20-1966 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, Council ordered the waiver of the $35°00 fee in the event the applicant wishes to reapply for a variance. PA~KING CONCESSION Mr. Ted Money, spoke ~o Co~ucil regarding request frcm Jr. Chamber of Cn~merce,~for permission to operate par$.'lng lot concession for Municipal Stadium 1966-67. The City M~ger suggested delaying decision on the matter until consideration could be given to the budget as the parking area may be increased considerably. On motion of Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councllm~n Eerrin and carried, Council postponed action until the meeting of August l, 1966. TUSTIN AVE. SEWER LINE On motion o~ Councilman Markel, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, Council ordered filed cc~munlca~ion from C. Arthur Nisson, Counsel for County Sanitation District No. 7 proposing compromise and settlement in District 7 vs Santa Aha case regarding sewer Line in Tustin Avenue, and authorized the Staff to negotiate for transfer of the property to Sanitation District No. 7 and bring a recc~m~endation ~0 CounCil on July 18, 1966. p.m., and public hearing set for July 18, The dates for study sessions for proposed hu~.~et 1966-67 were set for Monday, July 11, 1966 a~ 7:00 p.m., and July 15, 1966, a~ 1966, 7:30 p~m. ~CESS At 3~17 p.m., a 10 minute recess was declared. The meeting resumed at 3:27 pom~, with all Councilmen present. D~NTOWN PARKING DISTRICT The City Manager read and filed with Council a report on Plan for Central City Off-Str~et Parking Program in which he recommended the City should accept some share of costs of providing off-street parking in any business area based upon the following criteria: 1. The area is willing to invest at least 50% of the ~nitial cost of procuring the off-street parking area. 2. The city shall not be required to do more than match such private expenditures over a reasonable period of time (10 ~ears?).. The resulting properties when developed can be expected to provide at least the minimal demand for such parking within the designated time span. 4.. The parking shall be required for multiple usage (i.e., more than four~ or. s~e similar nm~mber of independent businesses) will be serviced bythe develolmment and the cost of the program borne by the properties to be served shall be at least as great as that which would normally~be required u~der~the application of the city's requirements for the private provision of off-street parking. 5. The title to the property contained in such off-st~e~t parking program shall be with the city, and the city shall retain the