06-20-1966 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

No. 65-11g, and the Improvement Act of lgll. The Clerk presented affidavit of public&ticm and certificates of mailing and posting notice 0f hearing on assessment and repoxted no protests received. There being no response to the Mayor's call for oral protests, the hearing was closed. It was move~ by C~uncilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman Herrin, that further reading be waived and Council adopt RESOLUTION 66-94 CONFIRMING ASSESS~T IN ASSE~L~£ DISTRICT NO. 229, SAI~TA ANA, CALIFORNIA. On roll call vote: AYES~ COUNCIEMEN: Gilmore, Brooks, t~rk, Herri~, Markel, · NcMiChael, Harvey NOES~ C0~NCIL~EN: None A~E~T, COU~CT'f.~EN: No~e ~ING - Hearing was -~ounced on Appeal 177' APPEAL 177 filed by Santa Aha Packing Ccmpa~ SA~A AEA PACKING CO. appealing conditions imposed by the Zoning A~m~strator in his approval of Variance Application 66-37 to expand a non-c~nforming use in the M 1 and C 2 districts at ~210 Dale Neinly, Attorney, 611 W. 8th, represented the applicant and explained his client,s intentidn to add a 15' x 3~' office for which the Zoning Administrator imposed conditions requiring 30 parking spaces, a 60' dedicatio~ on Bolsa and . continuing dffer to dedicate ~n future Shannon Street. Mr. Heinl~ stated that the applicant would a~ree to the dedication~ if he could be assured that at no t!~, in the future woul~ the City require that he make the improvements. Councilman McMichael expressed the viewpoint tha~ since this was not a new develol~aent, hut an established business desirin~ to make an improvement, he did not feel it was the City's right to require an additional hax~ship. It was moved ~y Councilman McNichael, seconded by Ccunci~w~ Eerrin and carried, that the appeal be granted a~d the conditions be deleted except the condition that the development be in accordance with the submitted, plot plan. Counci~m-~ Brooks qualified his vote by stating he was not in favor of deleting the parking requirement. N~/~NG - Hearing was announced on Appeal 178 APPEAL 178, TANE~ filed by George Lo Taney frsm the Plaguing C ....... issic~s denial of Variance Application 66-35 to establish an auto garage in the R 3 B district at 802 N~ Flower. The Clerk reported notice was mailed 6-13-66 and that letters of protest had been received from Mr. and MrS. 0skopp, 80~ N. Garn~ey, l~bel Stake~ 810 No Garnsey, A. M. Knabb, 82~ N. Flower, and Lois Whitlock~ 802 N. Flower. Mr. Cliff Baxter appeared for Mr. Taney, and stated there would be no struct.Ara! chauges in the building, the hours would be shorter, and the gas pump islands would be removed~ leaving the tanks underground and filled with sand. There being no further testimony~ the hearing was closed. COUncilman Brooks' motion to uphold the action of the Pl-n~ing C~mmission was lost for want of a second. It was moved by Councilman Burk~ seconded by Councilman Gilmor~e, that Council overrule the action of the Planning Ccmmnission and grant Variance Application 66-35, subject to conditions in Staff Commnents dated 5-23-66 with exception of elfm~nation of condition 10, and cha~ing the word "void" to "recc~nend voiding" and ~" to years years im condition 4. The motion carried with Councilman Brooks voting ~nO~o Mr. Taney agreed to the conditions as modified. HEALTH NUISANCE Council received a report from the Health Department regarding a petition submitted by property owners on West 5th Street in which it was stated that a poultry rauch on 1st Street between Euclid a~d Newhope CITT COUNCIL ~ 55~ - June 20~ 1966