02-05-1968 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

AMEND. APP. 619 - ROHRS Hearing was opened on an application filed by John Rohrs proposing amendment of Sectional District Map 6-5-9 to reclassify property on the east siae of Santiago Street between 17th and Catalina from the R l, R lB, and R 2 Districts to the C k District. There being no response to the call for testimony, the hearing was closed. A motion '0y Councilman Griset, seconded by Councilman Herrin, to approve the application and instruct preparation of an ordinance to reclassify according to Exhibit B, which would reclessify to the R l, R lB, and C ~ Districts, was adopted on roll call vote: AYES: Herrin, Brooks~ NOES: None ABSENT: None Carlson, Griset, Markel, Thurman, McMichael TAXI OPERATOR'S PERMIT Hearing was opened on an appeal filed by Gerald Farnsworth ~om the Police Chief's denial of a permit to operate a taxicab in Santa Ana. Since 'the applicant was not present, it was moved by Councilman Carlson, seconded by Counci~aan Herrin and carried, to continue the hearing to later in the meeting. At the end of other business, the applicant still was not present and the appeal was denied on motion of Councilman Carlson, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried. PARCEL MAP 537 Parcel Map 537 filed by Jack L. Carlsen, creating three parcels on the south side of Sixth between Wright and Lyon, was approved subject to conditions in the Planning Director's report dated 1/31/68, on motion of CounciLman Griset, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried. TENT. TRACT ~P 6540 WestMood, was considered by Council. Tentative Tract Map 65~0 filed by Emmet C. Rogers, creating 27 parcels on the north side of Santa Clara between Olive Lane and Donald B. Chri~teson, developer of the property, said they were in agreement with all of the conditions required by the Planning Commission except for Items 9a, 10, and ll. He stated that in regard to 9a, they would like to reduce the parkway area to 4 feet and have a ~ foot area inside a 4 foot sidewalk to give the owner an additional h feet of front yard~ in regard to Condition 10, the developer would like to plant landscaping against the wall3 and in regard to Condition ll, the developer would like for the City to pay the cost of reconstructing curb and gutter at new location. The Planning Director and Public Works Director, noting these requests and plans were not known to them prior to the meeting~ reported in regard to Condition ll that standard policy called for City to pay costs of reconstruction; regarding Condition l0 that previous Council instructed staff to recommend eight foot walk since park- way areas outside development were rarely taken care of; and regarding 9a the extra ~ feet is public right of way and not a part of owner's front yard. After a lengthy discussion, it was moved by Councilman Brooks, seconded by Council- man Herrin, to approve Tentative Tract Map 65h0 subject to all of the conditions in CITY COUNCIL 37h- February 5, 1968