Laserfiche WebLink
occurred in 2 years? If so, what is the process for the provider to get back on the ETPL? Can a <br /> customer request the provider? <br /> Resolution —Yes, per the Directive providers must be removed from the ETPL if they do not <br /> have at least one enrollment in the previous two program years (PYs). If they would like to get <br /> back on the ETPL,they must wait 6 months before reapplying to the ETPL and meet the <br /> continued eligibility requirements in the Directive. <br /> Comment#37—What is the process for schools that are already listed on the ETPL? Do we <br /> review all new requirements at their annual mark or do they need to be reviewed at the <br /> effective date of this Directive? <br /> Resolution—Per the ETPL Directive, continued eligibility applies to all training providers listed <br /> on the CA ETPL at any time under the WIOA or Workforce Investment Act (WIA), and whose <br /> initial eligibility has expired. A training provider's initial and continued eligibility is valid for 365 <br /> days after the provider is approved for the ETPL. Providers and programs already on the list <br /> can be reviewed using the policies outlined in this directive the next time they are reviewed <br /> for continued eligibility. <br /> Comment#38— Providers on the ETPL for two full complete PYs (July 1—June 30) must have <br /> at least one Title I, subtitle B enrollment during the previous two PYs. Does this refer to one <br /> enrollment in the entire provider or one enrollment in the individual program? <br /> Resolution—One enrollment for the entire provider.This requirement is not applied to the <br /> program. <br /> Comment#39—What is the reapplication process for programs trying to remain on the ETPL? <br /> Resolution—Please see the ETPL Guide Card (Attachment 5)for steps on how programs are <br /> submitted for continued eligibility review. <br /> Comment#40—Since continued eligibility can be reviewed at any time during the year <br /> (calendar or fiscal), which timeframe is used to measure performance? <br /> Resolution—The performance timeframe is for the previous complete PY, July 1st to June 30tn <br /> Comment#41—Will Local Boards have the discretion when they conduct continued eligibility? <br /> Resolution—After the program becomes initially eligible, they must be reviewed again before <br /> the end of the first year (i.e. a program is added to the ETPL on 10/22/2020, the Local Board <br /> must review the program again prior to 10/22/2021). Continued eligibility for providers and <br /> programs on the CA ETPL must be reviewed every year. For the local ETPL, Local Boards can do <br /> continued eligibility every two years. Local Boards can determine the time frame in which they <br /> review and complete continued eligibility as long as it is done within the required timeframes. <br /> Comment#42— For programs that run over the one-year period, how should the Local Board <br /> conduct continued eligibility? <br /> Page 9 of 25 <br />