Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution—Programs that are longer than one year should use whatever cohort is graduating <br /> in the year to determine if they meet continued eligibility. <br /> Comment#43— How do Local Boards determine which programs are up for continued <br /> eligibility? <br /> Resolution— ETPL programs in CaIJOBS have a Subsequent Review Due Date (SRDD), which is <br /> the date that Local Boards must review a program by. If a program is not reviewed by the <br /> SRDD, the program will automatically be removed from the ETPL. Programs that are 60 days <br /> from their SRDD will have a REAPP icon, indicating they are in need of review.The Detailed <br /> Report> Provider> by Program Reapplication allows Local Board to see which programs on <br /> the ETPL are due for review. <br /> Comment#44— How do Local Boards keep track of programs during continued eligibility, aside <br /> from reports?What if there are issues with how the reports function? <br /> Resolution—ETPL staff accounts allow for notifications to be sent to staffs email regarding <br /> new programs, changes to existing programs, and other changes in the ETPL module. If there <br /> are any issues regarding notifications, please reach out to the CaIJOBS Operations Unit at <br /> caljobsadmin@edd.ca.gov. The state is also working to revise provider reports to be more <br /> useful to ETPL staff. If ETPL staff would like to request updates to reports (new filters, new <br /> columns, etc.), they can email the ETPL box at wsbetpl@edd.ca.gov. <br /> Comment#45—Will we be using the most recent data available in ETP Report for our <br /> continued eligibility or waiting until a new year is submitted? <br /> Resolution—You would use the most recently available performance data to determine if a <br /> provider is eligible. <br /> Comment#46— Reviewing year-round instead of at one specific time may seem like a more <br /> efficient method, but in reality, it puts an onerous burden on ETPL coordinators. Couldn't it be <br /> possible to make the review at a set time during the year? Or Local Boards should have the <br /> option to review at a minimum, once per year, or every 2 years if programs are longer than a <br /> year? <br /> Resolution—After the program becomes initially eligible and is added to the CA ETPL, they <br /> must be reviewed annually for continued eligibility (i.e. a program is added to the ETPL on <br /> 10/22/2020,the Local Board ETPL Coordinator must review the program again prior to <br /> 10/22/2021). For the local ETPL, Local Boards can do continued eligibility every two years. <br /> Local Boards can determine the time frame in which they review and complete continued <br /> eligibility as long as it is done within the required timeframes. <br /> Cost Information <br /> Comment#47—What should the cost information for an ETPL program be matched to? <br /> Resolution—The cost in the Cost Details tab of the program wizard should match the cost a <br /> Page 10 of 25 <br />