Laserfiche WebLink
conjunction with an ITA mean? I thought ITAs and ETPL went hand in hand. Is it possible to get <br /> a link to MC3 in the policy? If a pre-apprenticeship is listed on ETPL must it be connected with <br /> a Registered Apprenticeship Program? <br /> Resolution —Pre-apprenticeships are considered an individualized career service, and are not <br /> required to be on the ETPL. However, if a Local Area wants to utilize an ITA,the program must <br /> meet the requirements to be listed on the ETPL. The pre-apprenticeship must meet the <br /> definition of occupational skills training and award an industry-recognized credential. If it does <br /> not meet these requirements, it cannot be on the ETPL. In order to be eligible for the ETPL, <br /> pre-apprenticeships must have a Letter of Commitment from a DOL or DIR DAS apprenticeship. <br /> The last paragraph on page 8 states that Local Boards should prefer pre-apprenticeships that <br /> are partnered with DIR DAS Approved apprenticeships. Here (PDF) are some resources for <br /> understanding Multi-Craft Core Curriculum. <br /> Third Party <br /> Comment #125— Isn't this third party subcontracting requirement applicable only to public <br /> colleges and universities? <br /> Resolution —This applies to both public and private provides accredited by WASC. <br /> Comment#126—Why are only WASC-accredited institutions limited from providing courses <br /> via a third party if they participated in development of the curriculum and ensure <br /> responsibility for the curriculum by issuing the related credential? <br /> Resolution—WASC providers do not have their third party courses reviewed during <br /> accreditation. To protect WIOA funds, third party vendors that directly receive tuition fees are <br /> not allowed to provide training unless the third party vendor provider and program is on the <br /> ETPL. <br /> Comment#127—Can an accredited training provider sub-contract to another training <br /> provider, as long as that training provider is accredited by WASC? <br /> Resolution— If the subcontracted training provider is directly receiving payment,they must be <br /> listed as their own provider on the ETPL. <br /> Comment#128— How do we determine which Local Board conducted continued eligibility for <br /> the provider? <br /> Resolution—The review record in CaIJOBS will show which Local Board completed the review. <br /> Worker's Comp/Supplemental Job Displacement Benefit (SJDB) <br /> Comment#129— Has this passage about removing Workers Comp providers been discussed <br /> with the agencies that currently use the ETPL (e.g. Worker's Comp, VA, DOR)?We have <br /> frequent requests from these agencies to verify and list their providers. <br /> Resolution—Yes,the state has discussed this language with other agencies. <br /> Comment#130—ETPL Coordinators get a lot of calls for people looking for worker's comp <br /> voucher training. It seems that the worker's comp customers have to guess what to do, and <br /> Page 24 of 25 <br />