My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19D - 2051-2101 E. EDINGER AVE.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
03/15/2004
>
19D - 2051-2101 E. EDINGER AVE.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:02:59 PM
Creation date
3/19/2004 10:26:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
19D
Date
3/15/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />D. <br /> <br />Bxpose Sensitive receptors to, substantial pollutant <br />concentrations? <br />Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number <br />of people? <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to SD-60 would not result in <br />land use changes or changes in development intensities that <br />would increase long-term operational air quality impacts within <br />SD-60 project area. Additionally, the proposed project would not <br />involve any construction activities that would increase short- <br />term air quality and odor impacts. <br /> <br />I:U:. BIOI.OGICAL RBSOURCBS <br /> <br />A. Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or <br />through habitat modifications, on any species identified as <br />a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local <br />or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the <br />California Department of Fish and game or tJ. S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Services? <br />B. Have a substantial adverse impact on any, riparian habitat <br />or natural community identified in local or regional plans, <br />policies, and regulations or by the California Department <br />of Fish and game or u.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />C. Adversely impact federally protected wetlands either <br />individually or in combination with -the known or probable <br />impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling <br />hydrological interruption, or other _ana? <br />D.Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting <br />biological resources, such as tree p-reservation policy or <br />ordinance? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the California Department of Fish and Game Natural <br />Diversity Data Base, the SD-60 project area does not contain any <br />sensitive biological resources. Therefore, approval of the <br />proposed amendment to SD-60 would not have any direct or <br />indirect impacts on biological resources. <br /> <br />IV. CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a <br />historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? <br /> <br />EXHJBIT 2 <br />6 <br />19D-10 <br /> <br />,---..--.' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.