My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19D - 2051-2101 E. EDINGER AVE.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
03/15/2004
>
19D - 2051-2101 E. EDINGER AVE.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:02:59 PM
Creation date
3/19/2004 10:26:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
19D
Date
3/15/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The proposed amendment to SD.60 would incorporate existing land <br />'uses buildings into the SD-60 project area, which are consistent <br />with the City's General Plan. Approval of the proposed amendment <br />to SD-60 would not induce substantial growth in the City, beyond <br />what is projected in the General Plan. Additionally, the SD-60 <br />project area is void of residential land uses. Therefore, <br />approval and implementation of the proposed amendment to SD-60 <br />would not displace existing residential uses or population. <br />XI. PUBLIC SBRVICBS <br /> <br />Fire Protection, Police Protection, Schools, Parks, Other Public <br />Facilities <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed amendment to SD-60 would incorporate existing land <br />uses and buildings into the SD-60 project area. Approval of the <br />'proposed amendment to SD-60 would not involve any land use <br />changes or changes in development intensities that would <br />generate additional demands for public services over current <br />levels of demand within project area. <br /> <br />XII. RECREATION <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood <br />and regional parks or other recreational facilities such <br />that substantial physical deterioration of the facility <br />would occur or be accslerated? <br />I:)oes ths project include, recreational' facilities or require <br />the construction or expansion of' recreational facilities, <br />which' might have an 'adverse phy~ca1 effect on the <br />environment. <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />No :Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to SD-60 would not directly <br />increase the demand for recreational facilities, in that, the <br />proposed project does not involve any lànd use changes or . <br />activities that would increase the demands for recreational <br />facilities. <br /> <br />XIII. <br /> <br />TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in <br />relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the <br />street system? <br /> <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />14 <br />19D-18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.