My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19D - 2051-2101 E. EDINGER AVE.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
03/15/2004
>
19D - 2051-2101 E. EDINGER AVE.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:02:59 PM
Creation date
3/19/2004 10:26:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
19D
Date
3/15/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Bxceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of <br />service standard established by the county co~gestion <br />management agency for designated roads or highways? <br />SUbstantially increase hazards to a design feature <br />Result in inadequate emergency access <br />Result in inadequate par~i~g capacity' <br />Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative <br />transportatiop. <br /> <br />D. <br />B. <br />F. <br />G. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed project would incorporate existing land uses into <br />the SD-60 project area. Approval of the proposed project would <br />not involve any land use change or changes'in land use <br />intensities that would generate additional traffic. Therefore, <br />approval of the proposed amendment to SD-60 would not have a <br />direct impact on traffic volumes, roadway configurations, <br />emergency access or level of services established in the County <br />of Orange Congestion Management Plan or alternative modes of <br />transportation within the project area. <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including <br />either an increase in traffic 'levels or a change in <br />locatiop. that results in sUbstantial safety risks? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval proposed amendment to SD-60 would not have any adverse <br />impacts on air traffic patterns, in that the existing buildings <br />incorporated into the SD-60 Project area are no more than 2- <br />stories in height and would not interfere with air traffic <br />patterns. <br /> <br />P. <br /> <br />Result in inadequate parking capacity <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to SD-6ß would not result in <br />impacts to parking facilities in that the proposed project does <br />not involve any land use changes or changes in development <br />intensities that would increase existing parking demands. <br /> <br />XIV. UTILITIES/SBRVICE SYSTEMS <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable <br />Regional Water Quality Control Board?, <br /> <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />IS <br />190-19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.