My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19D - 2051-2101 E. EDINGER AVE.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
03/15/2004
>
19D - 2051-2101 E. EDINGER AVE.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:02:59 PM
Creation date
3/19/2004 10:26:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
19D
Date
3/15/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The proposed amendment to SD-60 would not increase the maximum <br />level of development intensity permitted within the SD-60 <br />project area. Existing land uses and the proposed land uses to <br />be incorporated into SD-60 would operate at their current uses <br />and their current level of development intensity. <br /> <br />RESPONSES TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> <br />The following is an analysis of potential environmental impacts <br />associated with the proposed amendment to SD-60, based upon the <br />City of Santa Ana's Environmental Check List. <br /> <br />AESTHB'l'ICS <br /> <br />A. <br />B. <br /> <br />Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? <br />Damage scenic resources, ~ncluding but not limited to <br />trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings within a <br />State highway? <br /> <br />No Içact <br /> <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element there are <br />no scenic resources within the SD-60 project area. Additionally, <br />there are no scenic resources along State Route 55 that would be <br />impacted by the proposed project. Approval of the proposed <br />amendment to SD-60 would not result in adverse impacts to any <br />scenic vista or other aesthetic resources.. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Substantially degrade the existing visual character or <br />quality of the site and it's surrounding? <br />Create a new source of. substantial )"ight or glare, which <br />would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed amendment to aD-GO would not involve any land use <br />changes or activities that would result in changes to the <br />aesthetic environment of the Auto Mall. As part of the proposed <br />project, the proposed amendment to SD-60 would establish <br />architectural and landscape standards to minimize aesthetic <br />impacts. . <br /> <br />II. AGRJ:CtIL'l'URE <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Convert Prime Farmland. Unique Farmland or Farmland of <br />Statewide Içortance to non-agriculture use? <br /> <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />4 <br />19D-8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.