My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - SANTA ANA AUTO MALLS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
04/19/2004
>
75B - SANTA ANA AUTO MALLS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:02:48 PM
Creation date
4/20/2004 4:59:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75B
Date
4/19/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found <br />not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would <br />substantially reduce one or more significant effects <br />of the project, but the project proponents decline to <br />adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or <br /> <br />d. Mitigation measures or, alternatives which are <br />considerably different from those analyzed in the <br />previous ErR would substantially reduce one or more <br />significant effects on the environment, but the <br />project proponent decline to adopt the mitigation <br />measure or alternative. <br /> <br />1. AESTHETICS <br /> <br />A. <br />B. <br /> <br />Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? <br />Damage scenic resources, including but not limited <br />trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings within <br />State highway? <br /> <br />to <br />a <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element there are <br />no scenic resources within the SD-60 project area. Additionally, <br />there are no scenic resources along State Route 55 that would be <br />impacted by the proposed project. Approval of the proposed <br />Addendum would not result in additional adverse impacts to any <br />scenic vista or other aesthetic resources. <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />Substantially degrade the existing visual character or <br />quality of the site and it's surrounding? <br />Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which <br />would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed Addendum would not involve any land use changes or <br />activities that would result in additional changes to the <br />aesthetic environment of the Auto Mall. The properties included <br />in the proposed addendum would be subject to the SD 60 <br />architectural and landscape standards to minimize aesthetic <br />impacts. <br /> <br />II. AGRICULTURE <br /> <br />Pagc3 of 48 <br />758-57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.