Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />D. Create or contribute runoff water which, would exceed the <br />capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage <br />systems or provide substantial additional sources of <br />polluted run-off? <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />The project site is located within an urbanized area with <br />improved drainage facilities. Based on preliminary analysis <br />of drainage conditions and facilities on the project site <br />and surrounding area, the City's Public Works Department <br />has indicated that it is feasible that existing drainage <br />facilities within the project area would be able to <br />adequately drain the proposed project. However, to help <br />address cumulative drainage impacts in the project area, <br />the proposed project would be subject to Drainage <br />Assessment Fees. <br /> <br />E. <br /> <br />Place housing within a lOO-year floodplain, as mapped <br />on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance <br />Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br />Place housing within a lOO-year floodplain, as mapped <br />on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance <br />Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br />Place within a lOO-year floodplain structures which <br />would impede or redirect flood flows? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />G. <br /> <br />F. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the Flood Rate Insurance Map 0602320030F, the <br />project site is located within Flood Zone X and not subject <br />to 100-year flood risks. Implementation of the proposed <br />project would not increase the risk of flooding. <br /> <br />IX. LAND USE/PLANNING <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Physically divide an established community? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The proposed project would not physically divide any <br />established community, in that no existing residential uses <br />are located on the project site. The proposed project would <br />be compatible with other existing land uses in the area. No <br />adverse land use compatibility impacts would be associated <br />with implementation of the proposed project. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />3'~~~ <br />