Laserfiche WebLink
RECESS <br /> <br />present. <br /> <br />At 8:20 P.M., a five minute recess was <br />declared. The Council reconvened at <br />8:30 P. M., with all Council members <br /> <br />TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Nick Counter attorney representing <br /> the parents of students attending John <br /> Muir and Roosevelt Schools, requested <br />that Council defer action on the Traffic Safety Committee's report of decisions <br />regarding school crossing guards until after the joint meeting of the Santa Aha <br />School Board and the City Council on January 15. On motion of Councilman <br />Villa, seconded by Councilman Patterson and unanimously carried, the matter <br />was tabled to the January 19 Council meeting. <br /> <br />APPEAL NO. 22L - VA 69-86 Council considered Appeal No. 228, <br />ORD. NS-1000 filed by James F. and Mary C. Henry, <br /> appealing the Planning Commission's <br />approval of Variance Application 69-86, granted to Marshall L. Morgan to <br />construct a two-story garden apartment complex in the A 1 District at 727 South <br />Lyon Street. On December 15, 1969, Council directed the City Attorney to <br />bring back a revision in our ordinance which would make it legal for Flomar's <br />Kennel to remain in operation and tabled to this meeting the decision on the <br />appeal. <br /> <br />Mayor recognized C. Arthur Nisson, Attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. <br />Henry, the appellants, who stated that the proposed ordinance would eliminate <br />one of the objections of his clients, making their continuing operation legal; <br />however, since Mr. Morgan had made no attempt to modify the construction <br />of the apartment building, such as eliminating the second floor balconies or <br />e:~tending the wall on the south side to a height that would screen off the <br />kennel, his clients felt that an apartment thai close to a kennels would make <br />the kennels untenable since people looking down into the kennels would excite <br />the dogs. Russell Wagner, owner of a large kennel in Hawaiian Gardens, <br />spoke, stating he also owns apartment buildings, and in his opinion, there <br />would have to be some sort of a buffer between the apartment building and the <br />kennels. <br /> <br />The City Attorney explained that he had met with Mr. Morgan, the applicant <br />for the variance, since the last Council meeting and explained the feeling of <br />the Council, to raise the line of sight so that the view from the balconies would <br />not be directly in line with the kennel and had directed him to the Planning <br />Department to make any offer he might have; sinc: then, he has heard nothing <br />further from him. The Planning Director reported that Mr. Morgan had come <br />into his office on one occasion and was apprised of the situation; that Mr. <br />Morgan had apparently been unable to contact his architect over the holidays; <br />and that when the Planning Department had advised him that the matter would <br />be on the Council Agenda for this meeting, he had left a message that he would <br />not have a redesign. <br /> <br />After discussion by Council, ORDINANCE NS-1000 AMENDING CHAPTER 5 <br />OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 5-64 OF <br />ARTICLE II THEREOF PERTAINING TO KENNEL REQUIREMENTS was <br />passed to second reading, on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by <br />Councilman Patterson, on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -8- January 5, 1970 <br /> <br /> <br />