My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75D - GP AMEND H20 QUALITY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
07/19/2004
>
75D - GP AMEND H20 QUALITY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
7/22/2004 4:23:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75D
Date
7/19/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />o. <br /> <br />Tributary to other environmentally sensitive areas? If so, <br />can it exacerbate already existing sensitive conditions? <br /> <br />P. <br /> <br />Have a potentially significant environmental impact or <br />surface water quality to either marine, fresh or wetland <br />waters? <br /> <br />S. <br /> <br />Impact aquatic, wetland or riparian habitat? <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there <br />are no sensitive marine waters, fresh waters or wetlands in the <br />City. However, the City does contain several drainage systems <br />that convey drainage flows to sensitive marine resources. <br />Pollutants conveyed through these drainage systems could <br />adversely impact sensitive marine resources. Approval of the <br />proposed general plan element amendments would not result in any <br />activities that would discharge pollutants into sensitive <br />downstream marine resources. <br /> <br />The proposed general plan amendments would establish goals, <br />objectives and policies to provide for the conversation and <br />protection of watersheds and to minimize water quality impacts <br />in the City, including water quality impacts to downstream <br />marine resources. Additionally, approval of the proposed general <br />plan element amendments would not result in any adverse water <br />quality impacts, in that the approval of the proposed amendments <br />would not result in any activities that would generate <br />pollutants that would adversely impact water quality. <br /> <br />IX. LAND USE/PLANNING <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Physically divide an established community? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed general plan element <br />any activities or the development <br />physically divide any community. <br /> <br />amendments would not result in <br />of any land uses that would <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or <br />regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project <br />adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br />environmental effect? <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />75ð~~~1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.