Laserfiche WebLink
GENERAL PLAN - ALIG1N-MENT <br />OF MEMORY LANE - (Continued) <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson's amendment to the main motion to approve Alternate <br />Plan No. 5 from its easterly termination at Glassell Street running westerly <br />to the city limits and terminating where the railroad and city limits connect, <br />failed to carry, on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Her rin, tSatter son <br />Evans, Markel, Villa, Yarnamoto, Griset <br />None <br /> <br />Councilman Villa's main motion, to approve Alternate Plan No. 5, carried <br />on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Herrin, IVlarkel, Villa, yamamoto <br />Evans, Patterson, Griset <br />None <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Evans, to disapprove <br />Alternative Routes I, II, III and IV, carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYE'S: Herrin, Evans, Markel, Patterson, Villa, Yamamoto, Griset <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />RECESS <br /> <br />P. M., wi~h all Council members present. <br /> <br />At II:SS P.M., a five minute <br />recess was declared. The <br />Council reconvened at 11:45' <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING The public hearing to consider <br />APPEAL Z54 AND APPEAL 258 Appeal Z54, filed by the <br /> Department of Public Works, <br />and Appeal 258, filed by Robert Ewing Associates, appealing conditions <br />of approval of Variance Application 70-68 by the Planning Commission, <br />was opened by the Mayor. VA 70-68 concerns the proposed development <br />of property located at Bristol Street and Sunflower Avenue. <br /> <br />The Director of Public Works reported that the decision of the Planning <br />Commission to waive the requirement for sidewalks along Bristol Street <br />was appealed due to the fact that the Municipal Code requires construction <br />of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and paving upon application for a building permit <br />for a structure greater than 500 square feet; and that elimination of sidewalks <br />in this area is strongly opposed by the staff. He also stated that the Department <br />of Public Works is opposed to the provision for a second opening in the median <br />on Bristol Street. Arguments for both of the above items in Appeal Z54 were <br />based on safety factors for pedestrians and the projected heavy flow of traffic <br />into the proposed shopping center. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -Z9- January 18, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />