Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARING <br />APPEAL 254 AND APPEAL 258 - (Continued) <br /> <br />Mr. Richard Volpert, O'Melveny & Myers, was present representing <br />the J. C0 Penney Company, owners of The Treasury department store to <br />be erected on this site. He stated that they were appealing the relocation <br />of the gas sales area from the corner site at Bristol and Sunflower to a <br />location on Sunflower approximately 600 feet west of Bristol because of <br />traffic on Bristol which is five times more than on Sunflower. He stated <br />that is not a complete service station; it is for gas sales only, and a <br />service of this kind is best located at a corner which does not require a <br />left-hand turn. Two photographs of existing service stations of the same <br />type, and a model of the proposed gasoline sales facility, were presented <br />to the Council for consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Volpert recognized that the City requires sidewalks in connection with <br />construction of this kind; however, it is anticipated that there will be little <br />or no pedestrian traffic to the shopping~ center, and they would prefer to <br />landscape the area. The developer would landscape an area 13 feet wide <br />around the development. <br /> <br />Mr. Martin Miller, 1301 Avenue of the Americas, New York City, Traffic <br />Engineer for J.C. Penney Company, stated that a second break in the <br />median directly in front of The Treasury department store is necessary in <br />order to handle the flow of traffic that is expected; also that an internal <br />bnffer at the entrance distributing traffic either to the left or the right is <br />necessary. This will provide an outer ring of traffic and will avoid conflict <br />between pedestrians and vehicles directly in front of the store. <br /> <br />Mr. Jan Vail, Robert Ewing & Associates, 4440 Wilshire Boulevard, Los <br />Angeles, appealing the requirement that the developer pay for the cost of <br />the installation of a traffic control signal light at the location of the existing <br />median on Bristol Street, requested that any developer on the east side of the <br />street should pay a share of the cost. <br /> <br />Mr. J. B. Deasy, Vice President, Winmar Company, and Mro James Brewer, <br />V~inmar Company, spoke in favor of the additional median break on Bristol <br />Street. Mr. Ted Adsit, Costa Mesa, spoke in opposition to locating the gasoline <br />sales facility on the corner of the intersection. It was his belief that <br />entrances to the sales facility too close to the intersection would impede the <br />flow of traffic on both Bristol Street and Sunflower Avenue. <br /> <br />RECESS <br /> <br />A. M., with all members present, <br /> <br />At 1:30 A. Mo, a five minute <br />recess was declared, The <br />Council reconvened at 1:40 <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING ' ' ' <br />APPEAL Z54 AND APPEAL 258 - (Continued) <br /> <br />No one else desired to speak, and the Mayor declared the hearing closed, <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -30- January 18, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />