My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
08/02/2004
>
31A - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:01:34 PM
Creation date
8/6/2004 11:16:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
8/2/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood <br />and regional parks or other recreational facilities such <br />that substantial physical deterioration of the facility <br />would occur or be accelerated? <br /> <br />B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require <br />the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, <br />which might have an adverse physical effect on the <br />environment. <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />As mentioned above, additional parkland is needed in Santa Ana <br />to meet current and future park needs of the community. Without <br />additional parkland and recreational facilities being provided, <br />residents would continue to use existing recreational facilities <br />in the City. Implementation of the proposed project would result <br />in minimal increases in the City's population and would have <br />less than a significant impact on the demand for existing or new <br />recreation facilities. <br />xv. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in <br />relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the <br />street system? <br />Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of <br />service standard established by the county congestion <br />management agency for designated roads or highways? <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Potentially Significant unless Mitigation Incorporated <br /> <br />The proposed project is consistent with thè City's General Plan <br />and Zoning Code. Traffic volumes generated by the proposed <br />project would be consistent with the traffic projections in the <br />Circulation Element. No additional circulations improvements <br />would be needed for project related traffic impacts. However, <br />the proposed project would incrementally increase regional <br />traffic impacts wi thin the proj ect area. To mitigate potential <br />regional traffic impacts the project would be subject to <br />Transportation Systems Improvement Fees. <br /> <br />Mitigation Measure <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Prior to issuance of building permits the project shall pay <br />Area F Transportation System Improvement fee. <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />3.<A~ß <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.