Laserfiche WebLink
RECESS <br /> <br />men present. <br /> <br />At 4:40 P.M., a recess was <br />declared. The meeting reconvened <br />at 4:50 P.M., with the same Council- <br /> <br />SOLICITATION APPLICATIONS On motion of Councilman Patterson, <br /> seconded by Councilman Markel, and <br /> unanimously carried, Council approved <br />the application of the GIRLS CLUB OF GARDEN GROVE, INC. , 12911 Ninth Street, <br />Garden Grove, for a candy sale to provide operating costs for the Club and to <br />provide purchase of games and supplies; from January 13 to January 30, 1972. <br /> <br />In discussion of the application to solicit funds submitted by Handclasp International, <br />Councilman Evans stated he believed funds for charitable purposes should be <br />solicited by volunteers and that he was not in favor of an organization which withheld <br />8% of the receipts to cover expenses. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, to approve <br />the application of HANDCLASP INTERNATIONAL, INC., to solicit funds to defray <br />the processing and shipping expenses of medical supplies out of the United States <br />into needy areas, carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />A BSE NT: <br /> <br />Patterson, Yamamoto, Villa, Herrin, Griset, Markel <br />Evans <br />None <br /> <br />VARIANCE APPLICATION Councilman Patterson noted that <br />CPIADRON L. WILLIAMS although the Planning Commission approved <br /> VA 71-51 filed by Chadron L. Williams, <br />the staff recommended denial, and requested a report from the Director of Planning. <br /> <br />Mr. Wieland stated that this problem was created with the widening of First Street; <br />that;the City paid for a building in which the applicant was doing business, with the <br />stipulation it be removed. The building was moved back onto a piece of property <br />which the applicant purchased from the City, and in addition, a new building was <br />erected to the easterly section of the lot, making it impossible to meet parking <br />requirements even by eliminating landscaping. The Commission believed that by <br />removing the requirement for landscaping, additional parking could be achieved. <br />The only landscaping will be two planter boxes on First Street. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson stated that with the variance, they still would be six parking <br />spaces short of the requirement; that it appeared the shortage of parking was <br />created by moving the old building and erecting the new one, and moved to set <br />the matter for public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Markel, <br />and carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Patterson, Markel, <br />Evans, He rrin <br />None <br /> <br />Villa, Griset, Yamamoto <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -358- November 1, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />