My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-20-1971
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1971
>
12-20-1971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:32 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 10:28:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/20/1971
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A.A. 693 <br />CAL-PENN LAND CO. - (Continued) <br /> <br />The following persons spoke in opposition to the rezoning: <br /> <br />Mr. Sam Batdorf, 5314 Keelson <br />Mr. Tom Mueller, 5313 W. Keelson <br />Mr. Jim Bonham, 5310 W. Keelson <br /> <br />Opposition was based on the fact that the property has been considered for <br />variance or rezoning on several previous occasions; that the Master Plan <br />shows this area as R 1; that applications for R 2 and R 4 zoning have been <br />denied in the past; that the neighborhood would like to have the site developed, <br />but would prefer a variance so it could be controlled. <br /> <br />The Director of Planning stated that a map has already been approved for the <br />area; that there will be 10 lots, with 20 units; that R 2 zoning requires 3,000 <br />square feet of lot area per dwelling unit, but does not limit the number of <br />stories; however, there is a 35' height limit. <br /> <br />There were no further proponents or opponents, and the Mayor declared the <br />public hearing closed. <br /> <br />Councilman Yamamoto spoke against the zone change, stating that he is opposed <br />to any development allowing higher density in this area. Councilman Herrin <br />disagreed, stating that there are certain situations which exist where certain <br />zoning prevails and another type of development would be unrealistic. Council- <br />man Patterson spoke in favor of the rezoning~ lie stated that this would be a <br />difficult parcel of land to develop; that the height limitation will be 35 feet, the <br />density will be 10 units per lot; that it is not necessary to insist on a variance, <br />since the map is already approved~ <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman lierrin, to approve <br />Amendment Application #693, carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: Patterson, <br />NOES: Yamamoto <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Herrin, <br /> <br />Villa, Evans, Griset, Markel <br /> <br />RECESS <br /> <br />members present. <br /> <br />At 9:30 P.M., a recess was <br />declared. Themeeting reconvened <br />at 9:40 P.M. with all Council <br /> <br />APPEAL #279 The Mayor opened the public <br />VA 71-48 hearing on Appeal #279 filed <br />ROBERT H. GRANT CO~ by Robert H. Grant Company, <br /> appealing the Planning Commission's <br />denial of VA 71-48 to construct a 493-unit townhbuse development in the R'I zone <br />at 230 West Segerstrom (Dyer). <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -429- December 20, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.