Laserfiche WebLink
APPEAL #279,, VA 71-48, ROBERT H. GRANT CO. - (Continued) <br /> <br />The Director of Planning stated that Council has approved the first two units <br />of this development under VA 71-20 allowing 160 units of tow~houses, and <br />Conditional Use Permit 71-24 creating a church site; that VA 71-48 would allow <br />493 additional units of townhouses, making a total of approximately 660; that <br />the problem has been~the density factor in the Warner South area; and that the <br />Planning Commission recommended denial, on a split vote, at the request of <br />the applicant. <br /> <br />Mr~ Charles Dryer, Sales and Marketing~l~irect or. for all of the Robert H. Grant <br />developments in California, stated that the company requested denial by the <br />Planning Commission in order to expedite the processing of the application; however, <br />it was delayed because of a change of management personnel in the Grant Company. <br />He explained the Planned Unit Development program Which the Grant Company <br />is using in several developments. Slides of a PUD program in Stanton, California <br />were shown and he indicated that 53% of land use would be devoted to recreation <br />and 47% to buildings in the proposed Santa Ana development. He reviewed the <br />history of the project, stating that by more precise planning the total dwelling <br />units in this area had been reduced from 1968 to 1699. <br /> <br />Mr. Ron Wells of the VTN Corporation also spoke concerning the reduction in <br />density in the area; and in reply to questions from Council, stated that all <br />dwelling units will be townhouses and will be sold; that the price range will be <br />from $20,000 to $24,000. <br /> <br />There were no further proponents or opponents, and the Mayor closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson stated he is very much in favor of the Planned Unit <br />Development; that it gives the homeowner/buyer something different than a <br />tract home; that the over-all number of units is less than originally approved <br />by the City; that the mobile home park will not be developed, and the density <br />has been reduced by 268 units. <br /> <br />Councilman Yamamoto asked if there has been adequate planning for schools. Mr. <br />Howard Harrison, Santa Ana Unified School District, stated that they have been <br />aware of this develotSh~ent and that there should be no problem as far as elementary <br />and high schools are concerned; that the only area of question would be at the junior <br />high school level. <br /> <br />Councilman Markel requested information on fire stations in the area. The <br />Assist;ant City Manager stated that within the next few weeks, staff will be presenting <br />a new 5-Year Capital Program which will take these matters into consideration. <br /> <br />Ceuncilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Evans, to grant the <br />appeal and instruct the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution gr~nti~g Variance <br />Application 71-48 subject t0 conditions of approval contained in the Commission <br />reporl;, carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Patterson, Evans~ Villa, Herrin, Griset, Markel <br />Yamamoto <br />None <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL ~430- December 20, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />