03-13-1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS (Continued) Councilman Villa stated that the application in item 5-I was a bona fide restaurant, situated between a pizza parlor selling beer and wine, and a donut and coffee shop, and that he would llke to hear from the applicant. Mr. James Denmead, 2502 S. Bristol, stated that they will be serving gourmet Italian food, sandwiches, steaks, etCo; that there will be no entertainment; and that he is requesting approval to serve beer and wine. The Conditional Use Permit procedure was explained to the applicant; however, he stated that the procedure would require approximately 45 days for processing, and that he hoped to open his restaurant in about two weeks; that he would be losing a great deal of money under the CUP procedure. Councilman Villa stated that if it is definitely known that the business is not a beer bar, but a bona fide restaurant, the ABC application should be approved and the applicant should not be required to go through the Conditional Use Permit procedure. Councilman Herrin stated that this would be in defiance of the ordinance and that perhaps the procedure should be changed. The City Attorney stated that he did not believe an emergency ordinance could be justified and that he would like to have additional time to research possible actions. Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Herrin, to postpone item 5-I until the end of the afternoon session, was unanimously carried. VA 71-65 Councilman Patterson stated that a ERICKSON PROPERTIES CORP. previous application from Lorenzo's for a sign was denied by the Council because it was a deviation from the sign ordinance; that the staff had recommended denial; and that the Planning Commission approved the variance on a split vote. Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman lv[arkel, to deny Variance Application 71-65 filed by Erickson Properties Corporation to allow a pole sign 80' in height, containing 550 square feet within 300' of an existing pole sign on the same property at Zl01 E. Edinger, carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Patterson, Markel, Griset, Yamamoto Villa, Evans, Herrin None SURPLUS PROPERTY Councilman Markel requested discussion on agenda item 15. By common consent of the Council the item was removed from the Consent Calendar. In response to Cuuncilman Markel's question, the City Manager reported that all of the property involved had been vacated; and that there are only two families remaining on First Street who will need to be relocated. CITY COUNCIL -102- March 13, 1972