Laserfiche WebLink
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE <br />APPLICATIONS - (Continued) <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Herrin, and carried <br />on a 6-1 vote, Councilman Yamamoto dissenting, the following applications were <br />received and ordered filed: <br /> <br />REICHELT, CLARENCE A., 510 N. Spurgeon, On <br />Sale Beer and Wine, Original; <br />RUDOLPH, JOYCE E., 1212 S. Bristol, On Sale Beer, Original. <br /> <br />VA 7Z-Z0 - CORP. OF PRESIDING Councilman Pml-~erson suggested that <br />BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF Variance Application 72-20 to construct <br />JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY a 76-unit apartment complex in the R 1 <br />SAINTS District at 901 S. Sullivan Street, <br /> approved by the Planning Commission, <br />should be set for public hearing; that the staff recommendation was for denial; that <br />no building moratorium was established in this area, but that he is concerned about <br />the number of apartments throughout the City. Mayor Griset, Councilman Yamamoto, <br />and Councilman Markel stated they would support that position. Councilman Villa <br />stated he believes this is a bad policy for the Council to adopt; that the City will <br />not grow if construction is stopped. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, to set for <br />public hearing on May 1, 1972, Variance Application 72-20 filed by the Corp. of <br />Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints to construct <br />a 76~unit apartment complex in the R 1 District at 901 S. 'S~/tli~an Street, APPROVED, <br />carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Patterson, Yamamoto, Villa, Griset, Markel <br />Evans, Herrin ~' <br />None <br /> <br />VA 72-21 Variance Application 72-21 filed by <br />ZACHARY T. PEDICINI Zachary T. Pe~icini to allow a pole sign <br /> in excess of 250 square feet in the C 4 <br />District at 1208 E. McFadden Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission. <br />Councilman Yamamoto stated that the pole sig~ requested is in violation of the <br />ordinance and he is opposed to it2 - <br /> <br />Councilman Evans stated he believed Council should accept the recommendations <br />of the Planning Commission, since they are experienced, have held a hearing and <br />have given the matter consideration. <br /> <br />In response to Councilman Villa's question concerning the significance of a split <br />vote by the Planning Commission, Councilman Patterson,st&te4t that when Staff <br />or the Planning Commission make a recommendation he a~oes not always agree, <br />but he listens; that when a split vote occurs on the Planning Commission, it <br />indicates it was a close question and that they had difficulty in arriving at that <br />decision; that no ~Piticism of the Planning Commission is intended. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />-154- April 17, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />