08-07-1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OATH OF OFFICE The Mayor introduced Mr. John E. Ford who had been appointed to the Personnel Board and the Clerk administered the Oath of Office. CERTIFICATE OF The Mayor also announced that a APPRECIATION Certificate of Appreciation had been prepared for Everett Winters who recently resigned from the Personnel Board to accept a vacancy on the Planning Commission and instructed the Clerk to mail it to him. PRD - AMENDMENT The Mayor opened the public hearing TO MUNICIPAL CODE on the amendment to the Municipal Code, Additions to Chapter 34 and Chapter 41 - Sec. 34-57 Providing Waiver and Sec. 41-591 Procedures for Waivers, which was initiated and recommended by the Planning Commission and s tall. The Planning Director stated that when the original PRD ordinance was adopted by Council, the ordinance did not include a waiver of the lot size requirement in the subdivision ordinance; and that this ordinance was necessary to implement planned residential development. There were no opponents or proponents and the Clerk reported no written communications had been received, and the Mayor closed the public hearing. On motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto and unanimously carried, ORDINANCE NS-1124 AMENDING CHAPTER 34 PERTAIN- ING TO SUBDIVISIONS AND ADDING A SECTION TO CHAPTER 41 PERTAINING TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT was passed to second reading. VA 72-42 The Mayor stated that this was a MARTIN TREVINO variance application to relocate four duplexes onto an R 2 parcel containing more than 1/2 acre of land area at 918 North Bewley, and he opened the public hearing. The Planning Director stated that the Building Code requires relocation of building(s) to be completed within 1z0 days from the issuance of the building permit; and that a bond to that effect is required to be posted with the City. He further stated that in the case of Mr. Trevino, a time limit was not specifically imposed, but before the buildings can be moved onto the property, the applicant would have to secure building inspection approval, and the 120 day time limit and bonding would also apply to the relocation; and that both the Planning Commis sion and staff recommend approval of the Variance. The Clerk reported no written communications had been received on this matter, there were no proponents or opponents in the matter, and the Mayor closed the public hearing. On motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto and unanimously carried, the City Attorney was instructed to prepare a Resolution approving Variance Application 72-42. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -316- AUGUST 7, 1972