My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-02-1972
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1972
>
10-02-1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:15 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 11:09:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/2/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS <br />RABBITS ON BROADWAY - (Continued) <br /> <br />The City Attorney asked if Council would like a report on the matter and read <br />portions of Municipal Code Section 5.6, and pointed out that he would be glad <br />to review the matter and give a recommendation, however, that he felt that any <br />attempt to change the present ordinance would be fraught with problems in that <br />there are so many differences of opinion among residents with respect to the <br />raising of anirnalso <br /> <br />Councilman Markel then requested that the Department of Public Works make a <br />thorough investigation of the residence located at 1324 S. Broadway, and Mr. <br />Wolford stated that this would be done. <br /> <br />ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Councilman Herrin referred to the <br />REVENUE SHARING big "windfall" that had come to the <br /> City from the Federal Government, <br />and commented, on his feelings relative to revenue sharing. He stated that it had <br />come as a big surprise to him to hear Representative Hanna point out that revenue <br />sharing does have strings attached, and that very possibly Washington might decide <br />to change its mind even before it happens. He further stated that it seemed to him <br />that the Federal Government was always deliberately trying to disregard States' <br />rights and home rulei that revenue sharing was a concept of a socialist economy <br />which has no basis related to reality; that the majority of the people do not know <br />the difference between private funds and public funds; that every time the government <br />opens up a new office, it is sucking the blood of the economy out of the entire <br />system; that even though services are being provided to people, the economy suffers; <br />and that freedom is the most important ingredient. <br /> <br />He moved that Council review revenue sharing because government cannot give <br />us money that it does not have. <br /> <br />There was no second to this motion, and Mayor Griset stated that integrity would <br />demand that he vote against such a motion. <br /> <br />RECESS At ~:10 P. M., the Council meeting was <br /> recessed to 7:30 P.M., at which time it <br /> was reconvened with all Council members <br />present. Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the Invocation was given by <br />Chaplain Herman J. Baerg, of the Orange County Medical Center. <br /> <br />APPOINTMENT TO On motion of Councilman Herrin, <br />PERSONNEL BOARD seconded by Councilman Evans and <br /> unanimously carried, LaVerne Laskey <br />was appointed to the Personnel Board to fill the unexpired term of Harold Gosse. <br />After being sworn in by the Clerk, Council extended a warm welcome to Mrs. <br />Laskey and her husband, Philo <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />-387- <br /> <br />OCTOBER 2, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.