02-20-1973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RES, 73-15 Council considered the report CITY HALL PARKING of th~ Director of Public Works dated February 16, 1973, setting forth the need for short time parking near City Hall for citizens who want to pay water bills or make other short visits to City Departments. RESOLUTION 73-15 CREATING A 24~MINUTE PARKING ZONE WITHIN AN EXISTING 2-HOUR ZONE (PAl{KING DISTRICT B) was read by title only and adopted on motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Councilman Herrin, land unanimously carried on a 6-0 vote. (CA 18; CA 77.5) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION (MINOR EXCEPTION 73-2 - CAL ENTERPRISES) Council reinstated its protest of the Alcoholic Beverage License Application of Kenneth Peterson, Robert L. Purcell, and Joseph N. Turner, 70 feet north of 2533 South Main Street, which had been withdrawn by the City Attorney on February 6, 1973, after considering a letter sent to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board from the City Attorney's office dated' F~bruary12, 1973, explaining that Minor Exception Permit 73-2 issued by the City allows the applicants to serve alcohol within 300 feet of property zoned for residential purposes only on the condition that they operate a !'bona fide restaurant", and that the license applied for from ABC specifically preclurl~es'the operation of a "bona fide restaurant", on motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Councilman Evans, and unanimously carried on a 6-0 vote. (CA 146; CA 13.2) . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Councilman Markel stated that there was a problem with a blocked sidewalk at 806 Cypress where apartments were being constructed; that the City was leaving itself open to accidents; and proper consideration wES not being given to residents living in that area. The City Manager stated that staff would look into the problem and give Councilman Markel,a report. (CA 35) Councilman Markel requested the status of the Willowick Golf Course matter. In response, the City Attorney stated that information requested from Garden Grove had been slow in getting back to his office, but that he expected to have the~necessary information to present at the meeting of Ma~ch 5, 1973. (CA 'SZ. 6) , Councilman Markel stated that he did not believe that the lobby of the City Hall was the appropriate place for the portrait of Mr, Thornton; that he did not believe that Mr. Thornton would approve of it being there; and that the l~est place for the portrait was in the office of the City Manager. He als0 stated that he believed that the dedicatory plaque had been placed in a most obscure place in the lobby of the City Hall; that many people visit the City Hall area on Saturday and Sunday and would enjoy seeing the plaque on the exterior of the building; and suggested moving the plaque to the exterior east wall of the building. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 58 FEBRUARY Z0, 1973