My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-1973
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1973
>
06-25-1973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:09 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 3:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
6/25/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECESS <br /> <br />present. <br /> <br />At 12:30 A.M., a recess was <br />declared. The meeting <br />reconvened at 12:40 A.M. <br />with the same Councilmen <br /> <br />Mr. Billy C. Hall, Executive Director of the City Center Associa- <br />tion, 12542 Sally Street, Garden Grove, stated that he had lived <br />in the City from 1945 until 1971; that he worked in the City of <br />Santa Ana, and had attended school there. He read a letter from <br />the City Center Association dated June 18, 1973, and stated that <br />from the standpoint of businesses, that they did not have suffi- <br />cient number of customers to warrant maintaining a shop and that <br />the landowners property values were deteriorating; that from the <br />standpoint of citizens, that they needed to be able to point with <br />pride to their City; that if the deterioration was not stopped, <br />there would be a slum area; that a ghost town or a substandard <br />area was not wanted; that the citizens were going to other cities <br />to spend their money and the sales tax was going with them. <br /> <br />Mrs. Olive Banks, 202 North Parton, stated that the plan took <br />away the freedom of property owners to sell at top value. <br /> <br />The Mayor called for those persons wishing to speak in rebuttal <br />to the testimony given on the Redevelopment Plan and Ordinance <br />NS-1173 and the Report on the Redevelopment Plan. <br /> <br />No one came forward. <br /> <br />The Mayor called for any members of the staff who wished to speak <br />in rebuttal to the testimony on the Redevelopment Plan and <br />Ordinance NS-1173 and the Report on the Redevelopment Plan. <br /> <br />The Assistant City Manager stated that with regard to Mr. Gil- <br />maker's comments, there was no need to sell revenue bonds to <br />obtain tax increment, and regarding the Agency's financial <br />obligations, the Agency would not be a taxing power, and bonds <br />would not be a debt to the City of Santa or any political <br />subdivision of the State other than the Agency; that with regard <br />to Mr. MacDonald's comments, the City of Santa Ana had followed <br />all proper practices regarding relocation; that staff would be <br />happy to meet with Mr. MacDonald; that staff had spent many hours <br />with Mrs. Podolak and Mr. MacDonald, and that staff felt that <br />all documents were proper, legal, and moral in all respects. <br /> <br />Mr. MacDonald stated that he guaranteed there were some very <br />serious problems; that the Braithwaite Act Government Code <br />Section 7261 requires current list of all available real property <br />in the area and that the listing was not available; that as for <br />the moral aspects, he has serious concerns that the City is <br />responsible for those people that are indirectly caused to be <br />removed, and that he proposes to submit an opinion regarding <br />the City's responsibility and expansion of the relocation rights; <br />and that the matter is still at issue and it may be litigated. <br /> <br />The Assistant City Attorney stated that Mr. MacDonald had brought <br />up legal questions, and that discussions of the issues would <br />continue; that Mr. McDonald had been advised that in the opinion <br />of the City Attorney's Office the Redevelopment Plan and Report <br />on the Redevelopment met the requirements of the Redevelopment Law. <br /> <br />Mr. Gilmaker stated that the indirect relocation business would <br />add years of expense and cost to the plan, and read from page 5 <br />of the Redevelopment Plan pertaining to methods for financing the <br />Project. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />232 JUNE 25, 1973 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.