My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BERRYMAN AND HENIGAR 3 - 2004
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
INACTIVE CONTRACTS (Originals Destroyed)
>
B (INACTIVE)
>
BERRYMAN AND HENIGAR 3 - 2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2015 10:51:24 AM
Creation date
11/20/2004 1:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
Berryman and Henigar
Contract #
A-2004-096
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
5/17/2004
Expiration Date
6/30/2005
Insurance Exp Date
3/1/2006
Destruction Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Berryman & Henigar's Project Manager and Principal -in- Charge will work closely with City staff in defining <br />repair and rehabilitation strategies during each fiscal year. Once the repair /rehabilitation strategies have <br />been defined, the software will be used to identify the recommended maintenance and rehabilitation <br />projects for each street over a given period of time, which will cover a 5 -year CIP schedule. The <br />recommended projects will be identified on the basis of several criteria: cost/benefit of individual strategies, <br />present pavement conditions, current traffic volumes, current and unconstrained funding levels, accrued <br />backlog levels, future routine and major maintenance needs based on projected deterioration rates, future <br />AHRP objectives and goals, desired levels of service and available resources. <br />The primary emphasis of this task is to maximize the programming of street maintenance projects using the <br />most cost - effective strategies available, and taking into account a life -cycle cost analysis of each strategy <br />recommended. Within our report, three scenarios will be presented for the City to consider or compare <br />against. This will include reporting on the City's "current' CIP budget, as well as demonstrating an "ideal" <br />scenario (to maintain and ideal PCI level) and an unlimited scenario. Additionally, we will work closely with <br />City staff to proactively schedule projects to be included in Measure M funding recommendations. <br />Following this analysis, maintenance project lists will be generated for the several funding level scenarios: <br />the existing "actual" amount of available funds (i.e., City's funding level) and proposed, unlimited, and <br />constrained funding levels given the most cost - effective Pavement Management Plan. In this way, if <br />available funding is less than required for completion of recommended projects within a given year, it will be <br />easy to determine which projects can be deferred with the least impact on current pavement condition and <br />future rehabilitation cost. <br />Q. PREPARE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FINAL REPORT <br />The Final Pavement Management Program Report will <br />provide a summary of the findings from the condition <br />survey with the corresponding recommendations for the <br />implementation of the most cost - effective maintenance <br />program each year (this report will be suited for an <br />audience of managers and council members). <br />The report will be prepared in MS Word format that will <br />use the information found in the computerized PMS <br />reports in conjunction with the information and analysis <br />performed by the Berryman & Henigar pavement <br />management team. The report will provide the City with <br />information on: <br />Introduction / Executive Summary of the project <br />methodologies and findings Comparison of Budget Scenarios <br />Current inventory and PCI shown in tabular and (Current, Ideal, and Unlimited) <br />graphical format for all road classes and surface types (pavement condition report, priority listings) <br />Project graphs depicting pavement conditions broken down by functional class demonstrating <br />weighted percentages of PCI's and areas; <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.